Hunyuan-Large 7B on MATH-500: score, rank and what it means
Hunyuan-Large 7B scores 56.7 on MATH-500, placing it #499 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.
Score distribution
The chart shows the top 10 models on MATH-500, with Hunyuan-Large 7B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.
Top 10 leaderboard
| # | Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.2 Max | OpenAI | 1000000 | $21.39 | 89.2 |
| 2 | GPT-5.1 Reasoning | OpenAI | 400000 | $20.27 | 88.3 |
| 3 | GPT-5.1 Pro | OpenAI | 200000 | $19.77 | 87.8 |
| 4 | o4 Reasoning | OpenAI | 1000000 | $19.69 | 87.5 |
| 5 | Grok 4 Max | xAI | 2000000 | $19.70 | 86.6 |
| 6 | Grok 4 Reasoning | xAI | 2000000 | $19.67 | 87.8 |
| 7 | Claude Opus 4.5 Max | Anthropic | 1000000 | $20.90 | 87.8 |
| 8 | Claude Opus 4.5 | Anthropic | 400000 | $19.42 | 87.7 |
| 9 | Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning | Google DeepMind | 200000 | $19.69 | 87.5 |
| 10 | Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo | Anthropic | 2000000 | $19.57 | 85.7 |
What this score means
On MATH-500, Hunyuan-Large 7B sits at #499 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.7, so the gap to the top is 40.0 points. The median model in this index scores 76.0, which puts Hunyuan-Large 7B below the midpoint.
Tencent models average 74.0 on this benchmark. Hunyuan-Large 7B is 17.2 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Tencent model.
Among small open-weight models, the average is 53.7. Hunyuan-Large 7B is 3.0 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.
Read a 56.7 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.
Price context
At $1.08 per million input tokens, Hunyuan-Large 7B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MATH-500. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.
| Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3 DeepInfra 8B | DeepInfra | 8192 | $1.05 | 57.4 |
| Yi-Large 7B | 01.AI | 4096 | $0.83 | 55.0 |
| Codestral 7B | Mistral AI | 32768 | $1.05 | 57.0 |
| DeepSeek-Coder 7B | DeepSeek | 32768 | $1.14 | 57.3 |
| Hunyuan-Large 7B | Tencent | 32768 | $1.08 | 57.7 |
| Mistral Large 3 1.5B | Mistral AI | 32768 | $0.82 | 55.4 |
| Llama 3 Novita 7B | Novita AI | 8192 | $0.92 | 56.3 |
Other benchmarks for Hunyuan-Large 7B
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Percentile | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 64.0 | 471 | 22th | |
| GPQA Diamond | 56.3 | 446 | 26th | |
| SWE-bench Verified | 44.2 | 476 | 21th | |
| HumanEval | 61.6 | 472 | 21th | |
| AIME 2025 | 43.6 | 515 | 14th | |
| LiveCodeBench | 44.5 | 503 | 16th | |
| IFEval | 69.9 | 462 | 23th | |
| TruthfulQA | 63.4 | 484 | 19th | |
| HellaSwag | 71.7 | 505 | 16th | |
| MMMU | 58.6 | 448 | 25th | |
| Arena Elo | 1251.8 | 488 | 19th |
FAQ
What score does Hunyuan-Large 7B get on MATH-500?
Hunyuan-Large 7B scores 56.7 on MATH-500 in this index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the top score is 96.7.
How does Hunyuan-Large 7B rank on MATH-500?
It ranks #499 of 600 models, in the 17th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.
Is Hunyuan-Large 7B good at MATH-500?
It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.
How is the MATH-500 score calculated?
MATH-500 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.
What does Hunyuan-Large 7B cost?
Hunyuan-Large 7B costs $1.08 per million input tokens and $5.56 per million output tokens.