Coding · Tencent

Hunyuan-Large 8B on SWE-bench Verified: score, rank and what it means

Hunyuan-Large 8B scores 42.5 on SWE-bench Verified, placing it #495 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 57.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 81.7.

Score
42.5
0–100 scale
Rank
#495
of 600
Percentile
18th
within the index
Benchmark avg
57.5
all models
Leader
81.7
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
39.2
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on SWE-bench Verified, with Hunyuan-Large 8B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 81.7
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 81.1
GPT-5.2 Max 80.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 80.2
GPT-5.2 80.2
GPT-5.1 Pro 80.1
o4 Max 79.8
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 79.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 79.5
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 79.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
3 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2
5 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
6 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
7 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On SWE-bench Verified, Hunyuan-Large 8B sits at #495 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 81.7, so the gap to the top is 39.2 points. The median model in this index scores 61.0, which puts Hunyuan-Large 8B below the midpoint.

Tencent models average 58.0 on this benchmark. Hunyuan-Large 8B is 15.5 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Tencent model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 39.0. Hunyuan-Large 8B is 3.5 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 42.5 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $1.29 per million input tokens, Hunyuan-Large 8B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on SWE-bench Verified. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 3 DeepInfra 8B DeepInfra 8192 $1.05 57.4
MiniMax-M2 1.5B MiniMax 16384 $0.84 54.6
Command R+ 8B Cohere 8192 $1.21 57.7
MiniMax-Text 7B MiniMax 16384 $1.10 57.7
Hunyuan-Large 8B Tencent 4096 $1.29 58.7
Llama 3 Novita 7B Novita AI 8192 $0.92 56.3
Llama 3 Replicate 8B Replicate 32768 $1.00 57.0

Other benchmarks for Hunyuan-Large 8B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 64.1 468 22th
GPQA Diamond 54.7 466 22th
HumanEval 64.3 448 25th
MATH-500 58.1 488 19th
AIME 2025 48.4 467 22th
LiveCodeBench 45.7 491 18th
IFEval 70.6 447 26th
TruthfulQA 63.7 475 21th
HellaSwag 75.0 443 26th
MMMU 58.9 441 27th
Arena Elo 1279.3 447 26th

FAQ

What score does Hunyuan-Large 8B get on SWE-bench Verified?

Hunyuan-Large 8B scores 42.5 on SWE-bench Verified in this index. The benchmark average is 57.5 and the top score is 81.7.

How does Hunyuan-Large 8B rank on SWE-bench Verified?

It ranks #495 of 600 models, in the 18th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 81.7.

Is Hunyuan-Large 8B good at SWE-bench Verified?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the SWE-bench Verified score calculated?

SWE-bench Verified is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Hunyuan-Large 8B cost?

Hunyuan-Large 8B costs $1.29 per million input tokens and $6.63 per million output tokens.

Related