Commonsense · Tencent

Hunyuan-Large Base on HellaSwag: score, rank and what it means

Hunyuan-Large Base scores 83.5 on HellaSwag, placing it #304 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Score
83.5
0–100 scale
Rank
#304
of 600
Percentile
49th
within the index
Benchmark avg
81.4
all models
Leader
96.1
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
12.6
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HellaSwag, with Hunyuan-Large Base highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.1
GPT-5.2 Turbo 95.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 95.2
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 95.2
Grok 4 Reasoning 95.2
GPT-5.2 Vision 94.6
Gemini 3 Pro Turbo 94.6
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.4
o4 Pro 94.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
8 Gemini 3 Pro Turbo Google DeepMind 400000 $19.62 86.4
9 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
10 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3

What this score means

On HellaSwag, Hunyuan-Large Base sits at #304 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 12.6 points. The median model in this index scores 83.6, which puts Hunyuan-Large Base below the midpoint.

Tencent models average 81.3 on this benchmark. Hunyuan-Large Base is 2.2 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Tencent model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 86.8. Hunyuan-Large Base is 3.3 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 83.5 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $3.64 per million input tokens, Hunyuan-Large Base is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HellaSwag. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 4 Scout Base Meta AI 32768 $3.95 75.3
Sonar Turbo Perplexity 65536 $10.71 75.7
Auto Max OpenRouter 8192 $8.41 71.2
Fusion Pro OpenRouter 65536 $8.69 72.2
Hunyuan-Large Base Tencent 200000 $3.64 74.0
Llama 3 Modal Instruct Modal 128000 $3.84 75.2
Llama 3 Novita Chat Novita AI 65536 $3.50 74.2

Other benchmarks for Hunyuan-Large Base

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 78.0 241 60th
GPQA Diamond 69.1 292 51th
SWE-bench Verified 60.7 311 48th
HumanEval 79.6 244 59th
MATH-500 79.4 225 63th
AIME 2025 69.9 257 57th
LiveCodeBench 64.6 305 49th
IFEval 80.9 311 48th
TruthfulQA 74.8 335 44th
MMMU 73.1 217 64th
Arena Elo 1386.1 263 56th

FAQ

What score does Hunyuan-Large Base get on HellaSwag?

Hunyuan-Large Base scores 83.5 on HellaSwag in this index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the top score is 96.1.

How does Hunyuan-Large Base rank on HellaSwag?

It ranks #304 of 600 models, in the 49th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Is Hunyuan-Large Base good at HellaSwag?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HellaSwag score calculated?

HellaSwag is a commonsense benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Hunyuan-Large Base cost?

Hunyuan-Large Base costs $3.64 per million input tokens and $19.08 per million output tokens.

Related