Reasoning · Tencent

Hunyuan-Large Chat on GPQA Diamond: score, rank and what it means

Hunyuan-Large Chat scores 75.4 on GPQA Diamond, placing it #135 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Score
75.4
0–100 scale
Rank
#135
of 600
Percentile
78th
within the index
Benchmark avg
65.6
all models
Leader
87.0
GPT-5.2 Reasoning
Gap to leader
11.6
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on GPQA Diamond, with Hunyuan-Large Chat highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Reasoning 87.0
GPT-5.1 Max 86.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 86.0
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 85.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.2 84.9
o4 Turbo 84.8
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 84.6
Grok 4 Turbo 84.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
7 o4 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.34 86.6
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
10 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2

What this score means

On GPQA Diamond, Hunyuan-Large Chat sits at #135 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Reasoning, scores 87.0, so the gap to the top is 11.6 points. The median model in this index scores 68.8, which puts Hunyuan-Large Chat above the midpoint.

Tencent models average 67.7 on this benchmark. Hunyuan-Large Chat is 7.7 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Tencent model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 73.5. Hunyuan-Large Chat is 1.9 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 75.4 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.35 per million input tokens, Hunyuan-Large Chat is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on GPQA Diamond. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
MiniMax-Text MiniMax 32768 $4.44 77.0
Mistral Large 3 Base Mistral AI 65536 $4.47 78.2
Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo ByteDance 128000 $13.81 79.4
Grok 4 Mini xAI 65536 $12.21 77.9
Hunyuan-Large Chat Tencent 200000 $4.35 78.1
Hunyuan-Large Instruct Tencent 65536 $4.39 78.2
MiniMax-M2 MiniMax 200000 $5.19 80.6

Other benchmarks for Hunyuan-Large Chat

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 80.6 164 73th
SWE-bench Verified 66.3 185 69th
HumanEval 83.5 145 76th
MATH-500 83.3 141 77th
AIME 2025 70.4 250 58th
LiveCodeBench 73.8 112 81th
IFEval 84.3 206 66th
TruthfulQA 80.3 170 72th
HellaSwag 86.9 181 70th
MMMU 74.0 191 68th
Arena Elo 1413.8 174 71th

FAQ

What score does Hunyuan-Large Chat get on GPQA Diamond?

Hunyuan-Large Chat scores 75.4 on GPQA Diamond in this index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the top score is 87.0.

How does Hunyuan-Large Chat rank on GPQA Diamond?

It ranks #135 of 600 models, in the 78th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Is Hunyuan-Large Chat good at GPQA Diamond?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the GPQA Diamond score calculated?

GPQA Diamond is a reasoning benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Hunyuan-Large Chat cost?

Hunyuan-Large Chat costs $4.35 per million input tokens and $18.20 per million output tokens.

Related