Instruction following · Tencent

Hunyuan-Large Instruct on IFEval: score, rank and what it means

Hunyuan-Large Instruct scores 86.1 on IFEval, placing it #151 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 78.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 96.1.

Score
86.1
0–100 scale
Rank
#151
of 600
Percentile
75th
within the index
Benchmark avg
78.6
all models
Leader
96.1
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
10.0
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on IFEval, with Hunyuan-Large Instruct highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 96.1
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.6
GPT-5.2 Max 95.2
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 95.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 94.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 94.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.5
o4 Reasoning 94.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
5 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
6 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
7 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
8 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5

What this score means

On IFEval, Hunyuan-Large Instruct sits at #151 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 10.0 points. The median model in this index scores 81.2, which puts Hunyuan-Large Instruct above the midpoint.

Tencent models average 79.6 on this benchmark. Hunyuan-Large Instruct is 6.5 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Tencent model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 85.2. Hunyuan-Large Instruct is 0.9 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 86.1 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.39 per million input tokens, Hunyuan-Large Instruct is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on IFEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
GLM-4.6 Zhipu AI 128000 $5.10 80.2
Nova Pro Max Amazon 1000000 $14.05 81.2
Gemini 3 Pro Mini Google DeepMind 128000 $12.27 78.1
Kimi K1.5 Instruct Moonshot AI 200000 $5.15 80.5
Hunyuan-Large Instruct Tencent 65536 $4.39 78.2
Magistral Mistral AI 200000 $4.75 79.8
MiniMax-M2 MiniMax 200000 $5.19 80.6

Other benchmarks for Hunyuan-Large Instruct

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 79.0 209 65th
GPQA Diamond 75.4 136 77th
SWE-bench Verified 66.1 191 68th
HumanEval 84.0 132 78th
MATH-500 82.9 148 75th
AIME 2025 76.9 130 78th
LiveCodeBench 68.3 219 64th
TruthfulQA 79.8 187 69th
HellaSwag 87.7 153 75th
MMMU 74.3 176 71th
Arena Elo 1422.1 138 77th

FAQ

What score does Hunyuan-Large Instruct get on IFEval?

Hunyuan-Large Instruct scores 86.1 on IFEval in this index. The benchmark average is 78.6 and the top score is 96.1.

How does Hunyuan-Large Instruct rank on IFEval?

It ranks #151 of 600 models, in the 75th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 96.1.

Is Hunyuan-Large Instruct good at IFEval?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the IFEval score calculated?

IFEval is a instruction following benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Hunyuan-Large Instruct cost?

Hunyuan-Large Instruct costs $4.39 per million input tokens and $19.44 per million output tokens.

Related