Commonsense · Tencent

Hunyuan-Large on HellaSwag: score, rank and what it means

Hunyuan-Large scores 84.6 on HellaSwag, placing it #262 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Score
84.6
0–100 scale
Rank
#262
of 600
Percentile
56th
within the index
Benchmark avg
81.4
all models
Leader
96.1
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
11.5
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HellaSwag, with Hunyuan-Large highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.1
GPT-5.2 Turbo 95.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 95.2
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 95.2
Grok 4 Reasoning 95.2
GPT-5.2 Vision 94.6
Gemini 3 Pro Turbo 94.6
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.4
o4 Pro 94.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
8 Gemini 3 Pro Turbo Google DeepMind 400000 $19.62 86.4
9 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
10 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3

What this score means

On HellaSwag, Hunyuan-Large sits at #262 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 11.5 points. The median model in this index scores 83.6, which puts Hunyuan-Large above the midpoint.

Tencent models average 81.3 on this benchmark. Hunyuan-Large is 3.3 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Tencent model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 86.8. Hunyuan-Large is 2.2 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 84.6 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.33 per million input tokens, Hunyuan-Large is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HellaSwag. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Phi-4 Base Microsoft 32768 $3.15 71.2
Llama 3 Replicate Chat Replicate 200000 $3.74 74.7
Llama 3.1 Cerebras Chat Cerebras 32768 $4.07 76.0
GLM-4.5 Base Zhipu AI 32768 $3.99 74.9
Hunyuan-Large Tencent 65536 $4.33 78.2
Hunyuan-Turbo Turbo Tencent 65536 $11.60 77.4
DBRX Databricks 65536 $3.29 73.3

Other benchmarks for Hunyuan-Large

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 80.7 157 74th
GPQA Diamond 75.0 146 76th
SWE-bench Verified 67.8 149 75th
HumanEval 82.1 184 69th
MATH-500 83.1 145 76th
AIME 2025 74.3 170 72th
LiveCodeBench 71.8 151 75th
IFEval 84.4 204 66th
TruthfulQA 80.9 160 73th
MMMU 75.7 143 76th
Arena Elo 1394.8 230 62th

FAQ

What score does Hunyuan-Large get on HellaSwag?

Hunyuan-Large scores 84.6 on HellaSwag in this index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the top score is 96.1.

How does Hunyuan-Large rank on HellaSwag?

It ranks #262 of 600 models, in the 56th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Is Hunyuan-Large good at HellaSwag?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HellaSwag score calculated?

HellaSwag is a commonsense benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Hunyuan-Large cost?

Hunyuan-Large costs $4.33 per million input tokens and $20.11 per million output tokens.

Related