Coding · Tencent

Hunyuan-Turbo Nano on SWE-bench Verified: score, rank and what it means

Hunyuan-Turbo Nano scores 49.4 on SWE-bench Verified, placing it #426 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 57.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 81.7.

Score
49.4
0–100 scale
Rank
#426
of 600
Percentile
29th
within the index
Benchmark avg
57.5
all models
Leader
81.7
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
32.3
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on SWE-bench Verified, with Hunyuan-Turbo Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 81.7
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 81.1
GPT-5.2 Max 80.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 80.2
GPT-5.2 80.2
GPT-5.1 Pro 80.1
o4 Max 79.8
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 79.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 79.5
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 79.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
3 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2
5 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
6 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
7 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On SWE-bench Verified, Hunyuan-Turbo Nano sits at #426 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 81.7, so the gap to the top is 32.3 points. The median model in this index scores 61.0, which puts Hunyuan-Turbo Nano below the midpoint.

Tencent models average 58.0 on this benchmark. Hunyuan-Turbo Nano is 8.6 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Tencent model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 54.9. Hunyuan-Turbo Nano is 5.5 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 49.4 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.65 per million input tokens, Hunyuan-Turbo Nano is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on SWE-bench Verified. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 4 Maverick 7B Meta AI 4096 $1.52 61.9
MiniMax-M2 8B MiniMax 32768 $1.65 61.7
DeepSeek-V3.2 7B DeepSeek 4096 $1.75 63.2
GLM-4.6 7B Zhipu AI 16384 $1.52 61.8
Hunyuan-Turbo Nano Tencent 32768 $4.65 62.7
Embed 4 Reasoning Cohere 4096 $5.50 65.3
Mistral Large 3 7B Mistral AI 32768 $1.44 61.1

Other benchmarks for Hunyuan-Turbo Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 66.2 438 27th
GPQA Diamond 58.2 425 29th
HumanEval 67.1 421 30th
MATH-500 66.0 413 31th
AIME 2025 51.5 445 26th
LiveCodeBench 51.0 439 27th
IFEval 73.0 417 31th
TruthfulQA 67.9 413 31th
HellaSwag 76.1 426 29th
MMMU 63.0 398 34th
Arena Elo 1298.8 422 30th

FAQ

What score does Hunyuan-Turbo Nano get on SWE-bench Verified?

Hunyuan-Turbo Nano scores 49.4 on SWE-bench Verified in this index. The benchmark average is 57.5 and the top score is 81.7.

How does Hunyuan-Turbo Nano rank on SWE-bench Verified?

It ranks #426 of 600 models, in the 29th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 81.7.

Is Hunyuan-Turbo Nano good at SWE-bench Verified?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the SWE-bench Verified score calculated?

SWE-bench Verified is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Hunyuan-Turbo Nano cost?

Hunyuan-Turbo Nano costs $4.65 per million input tokens and $25.39 per million output tokens.

Related