Mathematics · Moonshot AI

Kimi K2 Base on MATH-500: score, rank and what it means

Kimi K2 Base scores 80.8 on MATH-500, placing it #194 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Score
80.8
0–100 scale
Rank
#194
of 600
Percentile
68th
within the index
Benchmark avg
72.5
all models
Leader
96.7
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
15.9
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MATH-500, with Kimi K2 Base highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.1 Pro 95.1
o4 Reasoning 94.8
Grok 4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 94.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.2
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 93.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo 93.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
5 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
9 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo Anthropic 2000000 $19.57 85.7

What this score means

On MATH-500, Kimi K2 Base sits at #194 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.7, so the gap to the top is 15.9 points. The median model in this index scores 76.0, which puts Kimi K2 Base above the midpoint.

Moonshot AI models average 74.0 on this benchmark. Kimi K2 Base is 6.8 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Moonshot AI model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 81.3. Kimi K2 Base is 0.5 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 80.8 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.82 per million input tokens, Kimi K2 Base is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MATH-500. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Nova Pro Turbo Amazon 128000 $13.18 78.4
Reka Core Turbo Reka AI 32768 $12.58 78.4
Llama 4 Scout Meta AI 200000 $4.90 79.3
Llama 3.1 Cerebras Instruct Cerebras 65536 $4.11 76.1
Kimi K2 Base Moonshot AI 65536 $4.82 79.2
MiniMax-Text Instruct MiniMax 128000 $4.59 77.7
Sonar Pro Perplexity 128000 $13.01 79.1

Other benchmarks for Kimi K2 Base

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 81.8 126 79th
GPQA Diamond 76.1 120 80th
SWE-bench Verified 70.2 106 82th
HumanEval 84.9 121 80th
AIME 2025 75.3 149 75th
LiveCodeBench 69.9 192 68th
IFEval 86.8 139 77th
TruthfulQA 83.2 104 83th
HellaSwag 88.5 124 79th
MMMU 73.5 204 66th
Arena Elo 1432.3 116 81th

FAQ

What score does Kimi K2 Base get on MATH-500?

Kimi K2 Base scores 80.8 on MATH-500 in this index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the top score is 96.7.

How does Kimi K2 Base rank on MATH-500?

It ranks #194 of 600 models, in the 68th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Is Kimi K2 Base good at MATH-500?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MATH-500 score calculated?

MATH-500 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Kimi K2 Base cost?

Kimi K2 Base costs $4.82 per million input tokens and $16.90 per million output tokens.

Related