Mathematics · Moonshot AI

Kimi K2 Instruct on MATH-500: score, rank and what it means

Kimi K2 Instruct scores 88.0 on MATH-500, placing it #67 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Score
88.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#67
of 600
Percentile
89th
within the index
Benchmark avg
72.5
all models
Leader
96.7
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
8.7
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MATH-500, with Kimi K2 Instruct highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.1 Pro 95.1
o4 Reasoning 94.8
Grok 4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 94.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.2
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 93.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo 93.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
5 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
9 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo Anthropic 2000000 $19.57 85.7

What this score means

On MATH-500, Kimi K2 Instruct sits at #67 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.7, so the gap to the top is 8.7 points. The median model in this index scores 76.0, which puts Kimi K2 Instruct above the midpoint.

Moonshot AI models average 74.0 on this benchmark. Kimi K2 Instruct is 14.0 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Moonshot AI model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 81.3. Kimi K2 Instruct is 6.7 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 88.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $5.80 per million input tokens, Kimi K2 Instruct is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MATH-500. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Grok 3 xAI 128000 $15.84 82.8
Gemini 3 Flash Max Google DeepMind 1000000 $17.43 85.0
Gemini 3 Pro Vision Google DeepMind 200000 $17.59 85.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo Anthropic 1000000 $18.37 85.9
Kimi K2 Instruct Moonshot AI 1000000 $5.80 82.3
Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 128000 $16.81 83.8
o3 OpenAI 400000 $16.80 84.5

Other benchmarks for Kimi K2 Instruct

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 86.5 44 93th
GPQA Diamond 78.4 76 87th
SWE-bench Verified 75.1 40 93th
HumanEval 87.3 82 86th
AIME 2025 77.3 124 79th
LiveCodeBench 74.1 108 82th
IFEval 87.5 116 81th
TruthfulQA 82.8 112 81th
HellaSwag 90.2 83 86th
MMMU 78.3 88 85th
Arena Elo 1458.6 55 91th

FAQ

What score does Kimi K2 Instruct get on MATH-500?

Kimi K2 Instruct scores 88.0 on MATH-500 in this index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the top score is 96.7.

How does Kimi K2 Instruct rank on MATH-500?

It ranks #67 of 600 models, in the 89th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Is Kimi K2 Instruct good at MATH-500?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MATH-500 score calculated?

MATH-500 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Kimi K2 Instruct cost?

Kimi K2 Instruct costs $5.80 per million input tokens and $23.99 per million output tokens.

Related