Instruction following · Moonshot AI

Kimi K2 on IFEval: score, rank and what it means

Kimi K2 scores 91.5 on IFEval, placing it #44 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 78.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 96.1.

Score
91.5
0–100 scale
Rank
#44
of 600
Percentile
93th
within the index
Benchmark avg
78.6
all models
Leader
96.1
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
4.6
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on IFEval, with Kimi K2 highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 96.1
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.6
GPT-5.2 Max 95.2
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 95.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 94.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 94.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.5
o4 Reasoning 94.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
5 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
6 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
7 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
8 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5

What this score means

On IFEval, Kimi K2 sits at #44 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 4.6 points. The median model in this index scores 81.2, which puts Kimi K2 above the midpoint.

Moonshot AI models average 80.8 on this benchmark. Kimi K2 is 10.7 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Moonshot AI model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 85.2. Kimi K2 is 6.3 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 91.5 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $5.85 per million input tokens, Kimi K2 is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on IFEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro Google DeepMind 400000 $17.16 83.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
GPT-4.1 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $16.97 83.8
Grok 4 xAI 200000 $17.90 86.5
Kimi K2 Moonshot AI 128000 $5.85 83.0
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo Anthropic 1000000 $18.37 85.9
DeepSeek-V3.2 Instruct DeepSeek 128000 $5.91 83.7

Other benchmarks for Kimi K2

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 83.3 99 84th
GPQA Diamond 77.5 97 84th
SWE-bench Verified 70.2 105 83th
HumanEval 87.1 85 86th
MATH-500 85.3 104 83th
AIME 2025 85.1 38 94th
LiveCodeBench 78.5 61 90th
TruthfulQA 84.8 67 89th
HellaSwag 92.3 38 94th
MMMU 77.5 107 82th
Arena Elo 1458.5 56 91th

FAQ

What score does Kimi K2 get on IFEval?

Kimi K2 scores 91.5 on IFEval in this index. The benchmark average is 78.6 and the top score is 96.1.

How does Kimi K2 rank on IFEval?

It ranks #44 of 600 models, in the 93rd percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 96.1.

Is Kimi K2 good at IFEval?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the IFEval score calculated?

IFEval is a instruction following benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Kimi K2 cost?

Kimi K2 costs $5.85 per million input tokens and $21.72 per million output tokens.

Related