Knowledge · Cerebras

Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B on MMLU-Pro: score, rank and what it means

Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B scores 57.5 on MMLU-Pro, placing it #554 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Score
57.5
0–100 scale
Rank
#554
of 600
Percentile
8th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.5
all models
Leader
91.6
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
34.1
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMLU-Pro, with Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 91.6
GPT-5.1 Max 91.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.2
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 90.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.1
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.5
GPT-5.2 Vision 89.5
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
5 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
6 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
7 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On MMLU-Pro, Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B sits at #554 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 91.6, so the gap to the top is 34.1 points. The median model in this index scores 76.1, which puts Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B below the midpoint.

Cerebras models average 70.9 on this benchmark. Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B is 13.4 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Cerebras model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 59.8. Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B is 2.3 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 57.5 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $0.48 per million input tokens, Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMLU-Pro. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
MiniMax-Text 1.5B MiniMax 32768 $0.58 51.5
Llama 3.1 Turbo 1.5B Together AI 16384 $0.46 49.8
Qwen3-Coder 1.5B Alibaba Cloud 32768 $0.76 52.8
Arctic 7B Snowflake 8192 $0.49 50.3
Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B Cerebras 4096 $0.48 50.2
QwQ 1.5B Alibaba Cloud 32768 $0.61 51.6
Seed-OSS 1.5B ByteDance 4096 $0.45 49.8

Other benchmarks for Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
GPQA Diamond 46.0 558 7th
SWE-bench Verified 36.6 544 9th
HumanEval 52.4 557 7th
MATH-500 48.7 568 5th
AIME 2025 38.1 549 9th
LiveCodeBench 39.6 540 10th
IFEval 61.5 560 7th
TruthfulQA 55.6 571 5th
HellaSwag 68.6 552 8th
MMMU 48.0 564 6th
Arena Elo 1198.1 557 7th

FAQ

What score does Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B get on MMLU-Pro?

Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B scores 57.5 on MMLU-Pro in this index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the top score is 91.6.

How does Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B rank on MMLU-Pro?

It ranks #554 of 600 models, in the 8th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Is Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B good at MMLU-Pro?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMLU-Pro score calculated?

MMLU-Pro is a knowledge benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B cost?

Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B costs $0.48 per million input tokens and $2.46 per million output tokens.

Related