Coding · Cerebras

Llama 3.1 Cerebras 7B on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means

Llama 3.1 Cerebras 7B scores 60.3 on HumanEval, placing it #500 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Score
60.3
0–100 scale
Rank
#500
of 600
Percentile
17th
within the index
Benchmark avg
74.0
all models
Leader
96.8
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
36.5
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with Llama 3.1 Cerebras 7B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 96.8
Gemini 3 Pro Pro 95.0
o4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 93.8
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
GPT-5.2 Max 93.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 93.4
Grok 4 Max 93.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 93.2
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 92.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Gemini 3 Pro Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $19.80 87.3
3 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
4 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
5 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
8 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
9 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
10 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3

What this score means

On HumanEval, Llama 3.1 Cerebras 7B sits at #500 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 36.5 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts Llama 3.1 Cerebras 7B below the midpoint.

Cerebras models average 71.1 on this benchmark. Llama 3.1 Cerebras 7B is 10.8 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Cerebras model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 56.7. Llama 3.1 Cerebras 7B is 3.6 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 60.3 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $0.95 per million input tokens, Llama 3.1 Cerebras 7B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Mistral Small 3 7B Mistral AI 4096 $0.89 55.2
Embed 4 Mini Cohere 4096 $2.48 55.8
Llama 3.1 7B Meta AI 8192 $1.01 57.4
Yi-Lightning 8B 01.AI 4096 $1.16 59.2
Llama 3.1 Cerebras 7B Cerebras 32768 $0.95 56.5
Llama 3 DeepInfra 8B DeepInfra 8192 $1.05 57.4
Llama 3 Novita 7B Novita AI 8192 $0.92 56.3

Other benchmarks for Llama 3.1 Cerebras 7B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 62.9 490 18th
GPQA Diamond 51.7 502 16th
SWE-bench Verified 41.5 506 16th
MATH-500 55.8 509 15th
AIME 2025 44.6 500 17th
LiveCodeBench 47.3 472 21th
IFEval 69.2 472 21th
TruthfulQA 61.9 506 16th
HellaSwag 73.7 461 23th
MMMU 52.4 525 13th
Arena Elo 1262.0 471 22th

FAQ

What score does Llama 3.1 Cerebras 7B get on HumanEval?

Llama 3.1 Cerebras 7B scores 60.3 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.

How does Llama 3.1 Cerebras 7B rank on HumanEval?

It ranks #500 of 600 models, in the 17th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Is Llama 3.1 Cerebras 7B good at HumanEval?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HumanEval score calculated?

HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 3.1 Cerebras 7B cost?

Llama 3.1 Cerebras 7B costs $0.95 per million input tokens and $4.53 per million output tokens.

Related