Coding · Cerebras

Llama 3.1 Cerebras Base on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means

Llama 3.1 Cerebras Base scores 79.2 on HumanEval, placing it #259 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Score
79.2
0–100 scale
Rank
#259
of 600
Percentile
57th
within the index
Benchmark avg
74.0
all models
Leader
96.8
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
17.6
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with Llama 3.1 Cerebras Base highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 96.8
Gemini 3 Pro Pro 95.0
o4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 93.8
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
GPT-5.2 Max 93.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 93.4
Grok 4 Max 93.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 93.2
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 92.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Gemini 3 Pro Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $19.80 87.3
3 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
4 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
5 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
8 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
9 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
10 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3

What this score means

On HumanEval, Llama 3.1 Cerebras Base sits at #259 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 17.6 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts Llama 3.1 Cerebras Base above the midpoint.

Cerebras models average 71.1 on this benchmark. Llama 3.1 Cerebras Base is 8.1 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Cerebras model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 72.4. Llama 3.1 Cerebras Base is 6.8 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 79.2 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $3.36 per million input tokens, Llama 3.1 Cerebras Base is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 3 Hyperbolic Hyperbolic 65536 $3.86 74.5
Llama 3.1 Chat Meta AI 32768 $3.82 75.3
Llama 3.3 Groq Base Groq 16384 $3.24 73.5
Gemma 3 Chat Google DeepMind 65536 $3.74 74.5
Llama 3.1 Cerebras Base Cerebras 65536 $3.36 72.7
Llama 3.1 Turbo Instruct Together AI 32768 $4.21 76.7
Sonar Reasoning Perplexity 200000 $11.48 76.2

Other benchmarks for Llama 3.1 Cerebras Base

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 77.4 265 56th
GPQA Diamond 66.9 332 45th
SWE-bench Verified 58.6 347 42th
MATH-500 74.2 342 43th
AIME 2025 67.8 298 50th
LiveCodeBench 67.7 231 62th
IFEval 82.7 253 58th
TruthfulQA 75.1 329 45th
HellaSwag 82.6 332 45th
MMMU 67.9 342 43th
Arena Elo 1387.0 259 57th

FAQ

What score does Llama 3.1 Cerebras Base get on HumanEval?

Llama 3.1 Cerebras Base scores 79.2 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.

How does Llama 3.1 Cerebras Base rank on HumanEval?

It ranks #259 of 600 models, in the 57th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Is Llama 3.1 Cerebras Base good at HumanEval?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HumanEval score calculated?

HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 3.1 Cerebras Base cost?

Llama 3.1 Cerebras Base costs $3.36 per million input tokens and $15.59 per million output tokens.

Related