Coding · Cerebras

Llama 3.1 Cerebras on SWE-bench Verified: score, rank and what it means

Llama 3.1 Cerebras scores 64.9 on SWE-bench Verified, placing it #214 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 57.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 81.7.

Score
64.9
0–100 scale
Rank
#214
of 600
Percentile
64th
within the index
Benchmark avg
57.5
all models
Leader
81.7
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
16.8
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on SWE-bench Verified, with Llama 3.1 Cerebras highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 81.7
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 81.1
GPT-5.2 Max 80.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 80.2
GPT-5.2 80.2
GPT-5.1 Pro 80.1
o4 Max 79.8
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 79.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 79.5
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 79.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
3 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2
5 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
6 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
7 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On SWE-bench Verified, Llama 3.1 Cerebras sits at #214 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 81.7, so the gap to the top is 16.8 points. The median model in this index scores 61.0, which puts Llama 3.1 Cerebras above the midpoint.

Cerebras models average 53.4 on this benchmark. Llama 3.1 Cerebras is 11.5 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Cerebras model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 66.4. Llama 3.1 Cerebras is 1.5 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 64.9 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.01 per million input tokens, Llama 3.1 Cerebras is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on SWE-bench Verified. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Gemma 3 Chat Google DeepMind 65536 $3.74 74.5
QwQ Base Alibaba Cloud 65536 $3.68 74.1
Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct Groq 65536 $4.08 76.7
Llama 4 Scout Base Meta AI 32768 $3.95 75.3
Llama 3.1 Cerebras Cerebras 128000 $4.01 76.0
o4 Mini OpenAI 200000 $11.92 77.7
Claude Opus 4.5 Mini Anthropic 65536 $12.72 79.0

Other benchmarks for Llama 3.1 Cerebras

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 76.4 295 51th
GPQA Diamond 74.4 156 74th
HumanEval 81.3 204 66th
MATH-500 82.4 155 74th
AIME 2025 69.8 260 57th
LiveCodeBench 66.1 273 55th
IFEval 84.6 199 67th
TruthfulQA 80.6 166 72th
HellaSwag 85.1 239 60th
MMMU 70.1 298 50th
Arena Elo 1411.3 179 70th

FAQ

What score does Llama 3.1 Cerebras get on SWE-bench Verified?

Llama 3.1 Cerebras scores 64.9 on SWE-bench Verified in this index. The benchmark average is 57.5 and the top score is 81.7.

How does Llama 3.1 Cerebras rank on SWE-bench Verified?

It ranks #214 of 600 models, in the 64th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 81.7.

Is Llama 3.1 Cerebras good at SWE-bench Verified?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the SWE-bench Verified score calculated?

SWE-bench Verified is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 3.1 Cerebras cost?

Llama 3.1 Cerebras costs $4.01 per million input tokens and $15.13 per million output tokens.

Related