Safety · Together AI

Llama 3.1 Turbo Base on TruthfulQA: score, rank and what it means

Llama 3.1 Turbo Base scores 77.2 on TruthfulQA, placing it #275 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.

Score
77.2
0–100 scale
Rank
#275
of 600
Percentile
54th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.6
all models
Leader
91.1
GPT-5.1 Max
Gap to leader
13.9
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on TruthfulQA, with Llama 3.1 Turbo Base highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.1 Max 91.1
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.3
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 Pro 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.7
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 89.4
Qwen3-Max Max 89.3
GPT-5.1 89.2
GPT-5.1 Turbo 89.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
2 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
3 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
4 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
5 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
6 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
7 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
8 Qwen3-Max Max Alibaba Cloud 400000 $18.53 85.9
9 GPT-5.1 OpenAI 2000000 $19.01 86.0
10 GPT-5.1 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.19 86.1

What this score means

On TruthfulQA, Llama 3.1 Turbo Base sits at #275 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.1 Max, scores 91.1, so the gap to the top is 13.9 points. The median model in this index scores 76.3, which puts Llama 3.1 Turbo Base above the midpoint.

Together AI models average 69.8 on this benchmark. Llama 3.1 Turbo Base is 7.4 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Together AI model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 72.3. Llama 3.1 Turbo Base is 4.9 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 77.2 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $3.30 per million input tokens, Llama 3.1 Turbo Base is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on TruthfulQA. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
MiniMax-Text Chat MiniMax 128000 $4.26 77.8
Llama 3 Anyscale Anyscale 65536 $3.94 74.7
Mixtral Groq Chat Groq 8192 $3.09 72.0
Llama 3.1 Cerebras Instruct Cerebras 65536 $4.11 76.1
Llama 3.1 Turbo Base Together AI 16384 $3.30 73.0
Mixtral Turbo Instruct Together AI 32768 $3.16 71.9
Nova Lite Amazon 65536 $9.20 73.4

Other benchmarks for Llama 3.1 Turbo Base

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 75.8 310 48th
GPQA Diamond 65.6 350 42th
SWE-bench Verified 62.2 275 54th
HumanEval 79.4 252 58th
MATH-500 76.8 284 53th
AIME 2025 68.3 290 52th
LiveCodeBench 66.5 264 56th
IFEval 79.6 342 43th
HellaSwag 84.5 267 56th
MMMU 67.0 358 40th
Arena Elo 1381.0 271 55th

FAQ

What score does Llama 3.1 Turbo Base get on TruthfulQA?

Llama 3.1 Turbo Base scores 77.2 on TruthfulQA in this index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the top score is 91.1.

How does Llama 3.1 Turbo Base rank on TruthfulQA?

It ranks #275 of 600 models, in the 54th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.

Is Llama 3.1 Turbo Base good at TruthfulQA?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the TruthfulQA score calculated?

TruthfulQA is a safety benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 3.1 Turbo Base cost?

Llama 3.1 Turbo Base costs $3.30 per million input tokens and $13.59 per million output tokens.

Related