Coding · Together AI

Llama 3.1 Turbo Chat on SWE-bench Verified: score, rank and what it means

Llama 3.1 Turbo Chat scores 64.2 on SWE-bench Verified, placing it #230 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 57.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 81.7.

Score
64.2
0–100 scale
Rank
#230
of 600
Percentile
62th
within the index
Benchmark avg
57.5
all models
Leader
81.7
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
17.5
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on SWE-bench Verified, with Llama 3.1 Turbo Chat highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 81.7
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 81.1
GPT-5.2 Max 80.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 80.2
GPT-5.2 80.2
GPT-5.1 Pro 80.1
o4 Max 79.8
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 79.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 79.5
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 79.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
3 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2
5 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
6 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
7 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On SWE-bench Verified, Llama 3.1 Turbo Chat sits at #230 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 81.7, so the gap to the top is 17.5 points. The median model in this index scores 61.0, which puts Llama 3.1 Turbo Chat above the midpoint.

Together AI models average 52.1 on this benchmark. Llama 3.1 Turbo Chat is 12.1 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Together AI model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 66.4. Llama 3.1 Turbo Chat is 2.2 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 64.2 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $3.95 per million input tokens, Llama 3.1 Turbo Chat is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on SWE-bench Verified. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 3 Lambda Instruct Lambda 32768 $3.92 75.8
Mistral Large 3 Base Mistral AI 65536 $4.47 78.2
Llama 3 Lambda Chat Lambda 32768 $3.73 74.7
Llama 3.1 Instruct Meta AI 200000 $4.05 75.7
Llama 3.1 Turbo Chat Together AI 200000 $3.95 76.1
Hunyuan-Turbo Pro Tencent 65536 $12.00 77.6
Qwen3-Coder Base Alibaba Cloud 200000 $3.99 76.6

Other benchmarks for Llama 3.1 Turbo Chat

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 80.8 155 74th
GPQA Diamond 73.6 182 70th
HumanEval 80.9 216 64th
MATH-500 81.5 176 71th
AIME 2025 73.0 202 66th
LiveCodeBench 69.9 194 68th
IFEval 83.0 243 60th
TruthfulQA 76.0 307 49th
HellaSwag 83.7 294 51th
MMMU 70.9 275 54th
Arena Elo 1404.5 195 68th

FAQ

What score does Llama 3.1 Turbo Chat get on SWE-bench Verified?

Llama 3.1 Turbo Chat scores 64.2 on SWE-bench Verified in this index. The benchmark average is 57.5 and the top score is 81.7.

How does Llama 3.1 Turbo Chat rank on SWE-bench Verified?

It ranks #230 of 600 models, in the 62nd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 81.7.

Is Llama 3.1 Turbo Chat good at SWE-bench Verified?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the SWE-bench Verified score calculated?

SWE-bench Verified is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 3.1 Turbo Chat cost?

Llama 3.1 Turbo Chat costs $3.95 per million input tokens and $20.39 per million output tokens.

Related