Preference · Meta AI

Llama 3.3 Chat on Arena Elo: score, rank and what it means

Llama 3.3 Chat scores 1399.7 on Arena Elo, placing it #208 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 1349.9 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Max at 1501.9.

Score
1399.7
0–100 scale
Rank
#208
of 600
Percentile
65th
within the index
Benchmark avg
1349.9
all models
Leader
1501.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Max
Gap to leader
102.2
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on Arena Elo, with Llama 3.3 Chat highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Max 1501.9
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 1500.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 1500.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 1497.5
GPT-5.2 Max 1495.3
Gemini 3 Pro Turbo 1494.9
Grok 4 Max 1491.4
Claude Opus 4.5 1491.2
GPT-5.1 Pro 1490.0
Grok 4 Reasoning 1487.6

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
2 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
3 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
5 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
6 Gemini 3 Pro Turbo Google DeepMind 400000 $19.62 86.4
7 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
9 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
10 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8

What this score means

On Arena Elo, Llama 3.3 Chat sits at #208 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Max, scores 1501.9, so the gap to the top is 102.2 points. The median model in this index scores 1373.8, which puts Llama 3.3 Chat above the midpoint.

Meta AI models average 1342.5 on this benchmark. Llama 3.3 Chat is 57.2 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Meta AI model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 1409.6. Llama 3.3 Chat is 9.9 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 1399.7 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.18 per million input tokens, Llama 3.3 Chat is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on Arena Elo. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Command R+ Chat Cohere 32768 $4.02 76.0
Phi-4 Instruct Microsoft 128000 $3.79 75.3
Seed-OSS Instruct ByteDance 128000 $3.79 76.0
Llama 3 Baseten Baseten 128000 $3.62 74.9
Llama 3.3 Chat Meta AI 32768 $4.18 76.9
Gemini 2.5 Pro Mini Google DeepMind 128000 $10.07 74.2
Llama 3.3 Groq Groq 32768 $3.98 76.8

Other benchmarks for Llama 3.3 Chat

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 77.9 245 59th
GPQA Diamond 74.4 157 74th
SWE-bench Verified 67.7 154 74th
HumanEval 81.3 206 66th
MATH-500 79.5 222 63th
AIME 2025 70.4 252 58th
LiveCodeBench 69.7 197 67th
IFEval 85.0 191 68th
TruthfulQA 79.0 218 64th
HellaSwag 87.1 173 71th
MMMU 73.4 207 66th

FAQ

What score does Llama 3.3 Chat get on Arena Elo?

Llama 3.3 Chat scores 1399.7 on Arena Elo in this index. The benchmark average is 1349.9 and the top score is 1501.9.

How does Llama 3.3 Chat rank on Arena Elo?

It ranks #208 of 600 models, in the 65th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Max at 1501.9.

Is Llama 3.3 Chat good at Arena Elo?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the Arena Elo score calculated?

Arena Elo is a preference benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 3.3 Chat cost?

Llama 3.3 Chat costs $4.18 per million input tokens and $17.67 per million output tokens.

Related