Multimodal · Meta AI

Llama 3.3 Chat on MMMU: score, rank and what it means

Llama 3.3 Chat scores 73.4 on MMMU, placing it #207 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Score
73.4
0–100 scale
Rank
#207
of 600
Percentile
66th
within the index
Benchmark avg
67.1
all models
Leader
86.9
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
13.5
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMMU, with Llama 3.3 Chat highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 86.9
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 86.2
GPT-5.2 85.3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.1 Max 85.1
Grok 4 Pro 84.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro 84.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.4
GPT-5.2 Vision 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
5 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
6 Grok 4 Pro xAI 1000000 $19.00 85.4
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $18.73 86.7
9 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
10 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4

What this score means

On MMMU, Llama 3.3 Chat sits at #207 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 86.9, so the gap to the top is 13.5 points. The median model in this index scores 70.0, which puts Llama 3.3 Chat above the midpoint.

Meta AI models average 66.5 on this benchmark. Llama 3.3 Chat is 6.9 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Meta AI model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 74.3. Llama 3.3 Chat is 0.9 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 73.4 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.18 per million input tokens, Llama 3.3 Chat is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMMU. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
GLM-4.6 Chat Zhipu AI 400000 $4.89 79.8
Kimi K2 Base Moonshot AI 65536 $4.82 79.2
Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct Groq 65536 $4.08 76.7
Seed-OSS ByteDance 32768 $3.74 75.3
Llama 3.3 Chat Meta AI 32768 $4.18 76.9
Qwen3-Coder Base Alibaba Cloud 200000 $3.99 76.6
Reka Core Reka AI 32768 $12.17 77.4

Other benchmarks for Llama 3.3 Chat

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 77.9 245 59th
GPQA Diamond 74.4 157 74th
SWE-bench Verified 67.7 154 74th
HumanEval 81.3 206 66th
MATH-500 79.5 222 63th
AIME 2025 70.4 252 58th
LiveCodeBench 69.7 197 67th
IFEval 85.0 191 68th
TruthfulQA 79.0 218 64th
HellaSwag 87.1 173 71th
Arena Elo 1399.7 208 65th

FAQ

What score does Llama 3.3 Chat get on MMMU?

Llama 3.3 Chat scores 73.4 on MMMU in this index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the top score is 86.9.

How does Llama 3.3 Chat rank on MMMU?

It ranks #207 of 600 models, in the 66th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Is Llama 3.3 Chat good at MMMU?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMMU score calculated?

MMMU is a multimodal benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 3.3 Chat cost?

Llama 3.3 Chat costs $4.18 per million input tokens and $17.67 per million output tokens.

Related