Coding · Groq

Llama 3.3 Groq Base on LiveCodeBench: score, rank and what it means

Llama 3.3 Groq Base scores 66.8 on LiveCodeBench, placing it #257 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 61.0 and the leader is Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning at 85.1.

Score
66.8
0–100 scale
Rank
#257
of 600
Percentile
57th
within the index
Benchmark avg
61.0
all models
Leader
85.1
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning
Gap to leader
18.3
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on LiveCodeBench, with Llama 3.3 Groq Base highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.1
Grok 4 Reasoning 85.1
Claude Opus 4.5 85.0
GPT-5.2 Max 84.8
Grok 4 Turbo 84.7
GPT-5.1 Turbo 84.6
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.6
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 84.1
Gemini 3 Pro Max 83.6

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
2 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
4 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
5 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
6 GPT-5.1 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.19 86.1
7 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
8 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On LiveCodeBench, Llama 3.3 Groq Base sits at #257 of 600. The leader, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning, scores 85.1, so the gap to the top is 18.3 points. The median model in this index scores 64.7, which puts Llama 3.3 Groq Base above the midpoint.

Groq models average 55.6 on this benchmark. Llama 3.3 Groq Base is 11.2 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Groq model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 59.1. Llama 3.3 Groq Base is 7.7 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 66.8 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $3.24 per million input tokens, Llama 3.3 Groq Base is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on LiveCodeBench. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
ERNIE 4.0 Baidu 32768 $11.37 76.7
Llama 3 Novita Novita AI 128000 $3.70 74.4
Llama 3.1 Turbo Instruct Together AI 32768 $4.21 76.7
Llama 3 Replicate Base Replicate 65536 $3.15 72.1
Llama 3.3 Groq Base Groq 16384 $3.24 73.5
Llama 3.1 Meta AI 200000 $4.16 76.3
Fusion Reasoning OpenRouter 65536 $8.59 72.2

Other benchmarks for Llama 3.3 Groq Base

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 75.3 324 46th
GPQA Diamond 65.6 351 42th
SWE-bench Verified 61.0 298 50th
HumanEval 79.3 257 57th
MATH-500 77.3 271 55th
AIME 2025 71.0 235 61th
IFEval 81.0 310 48th
TruthfulQA 75.9 310 48th
HellaSwag 85.2 235 61th
MMMU 69.8 311 48th
Arena Elo 1375.9 288 52th

FAQ

What score does Llama 3.3 Groq Base get on LiveCodeBench?

Llama 3.3 Groq Base scores 66.8 on LiveCodeBench in this index. The benchmark average is 61.0 and the top score is 85.1.

How does Llama 3.3 Groq Base rank on LiveCodeBench?

It ranks #257 of 600 models, in the 57th percentile. The leader is Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning at 85.1.

Is Llama 3.3 Groq Base good at LiveCodeBench?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the LiveCodeBench score calculated?

LiveCodeBench is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 3.3 Groq Base cost?

Llama 3.3 Groq Base costs $3.24 per million input tokens and $12.28 per million output tokens.

Related