Coding · Groq

Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means

Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct scores 79.6 on HumanEval, placing it #246 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Score
79.6
0–100 scale
Rank
#246
of 600
Percentile
59th
within the index
Benchmark avg
74.0
all models
Leader
96.8
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
17.2
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 96.8
Gemini 3 Pro Pro 95.0
o4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 93.8
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
GPT-5.2 Max 93.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 93.4
Grok 4 Max 93.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 93.2
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 92.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Gemini 3 Pro Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $19.80 87.3
3 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
4 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
5 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
8 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
9 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
10 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3

What this score means

On HumanEval, Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct sits at #246 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 17.2 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct above the midpoint.

Groq models average 68.3 on this benchmark. Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct is 11.3 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Groq model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 82.2. Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct is 2.6 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 79.6 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.08 per million input tokens, Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Hunyuan-Turbo Turbo Tencent 65536 $11.60 77.4
Mistral Small 3 Instruct Mistral AI 32768 $3.97 75.1
Hunyuan-Large Base Tencent 200000 $3.64 74.0
Llama 3 Replicate Chat Replicate 200000 $3.74 74.7
Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct Groq 65536 $4.08 76.7
Llama 3 Anyscale Chat Anyscale 65536 $3.67 74.6
Llama 3 Modal Instruct Modal 128000 $3.84 75.2

Other benchmarks for Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 81.2 142 76th
GPQA Diamond 74.0 169 72th
SWE-bench Verified 65.1 212 65th
MATH-500 79.3 227 62th
AIME 2025 74.7 160 73th
LiveCodeBench 66.5 265 56th
IFEval 85.7 167 72th
TruthfulQA 79.7 195 68th
HellaSwag 84.8 257 57th
MMMU 73.5 205 66th
Arena Elo 1394.0 234 61th

FAQ

What score does Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct get on HumanEval?

Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct scores 79.6 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.

How does Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct rank on HumanEval?

It ranks #246 of 600 models, in the 59th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Is Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct good at HumanEval?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HumanEval score calculated?

HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct cost?

Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct costs $4.08 per million input tokens and $22.27 per million output tokens.

Related