Reasoning · Meta AI

Llama 3.3 Instruct on GPQA Diamond: score, rank and what it means

Llama 3.3 Instruct scores 70.1 on GPQA Diamond, placing it #257 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Score
70.1
0–100 scale
Rank
#257
of 600
Percentile
57th
within the index
Benchmark avg
65.6
all models
Leader
87.0
GPT-5.2 Reasoning
Gap to leader
16.9
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on GPQA Diamond, with Llama 3.3 Instruct highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Reasoning 87.0
GPT-5.1 Max 86.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 86.0
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 85.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.2 84.9
o4 Turbo 84.8
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 84.6
Grok 4 Turbo 84.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
7 o4 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.34 86.6
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
10 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2

What this score means

On GPQA Diamond, Llama 3.3 Instruct sits at #257 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Reasoning, scores 87.0, so the gap to the top is 16.9 points. The median model in this index scores 68.8, which puts Llama 3.3 Instruct above the midpoint.

Meta AI models average 64.6 on this benchmark. Llama 3.3 Instruct is 5.5 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Meta AI model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 73.5. Llama 3.3 Instruct is 3.4 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 70.1 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.33 per million input tokens, Llama 3.3 Instruct is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on GPQA Diamond. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Reka Flash Reasoning Reka AI 32768 $10.70 75.6
Grok 3 Mini xAI 200000 $9.67 73.9
Reka Flash Turbo Reka AI 128000 $10.19 75.1
Llama 3 Hyperbolic Instruct Hyperbolic 200000 $3.79 76.2
Llama 3.3 Instruct Meta AI 128000 $4.33 76.6
Phi-4 Chat Microsoft 65536 $3.66 74.7
Qwen3-Max Mini Alibaba Cloud 128000 $11.13 76.5

Other benchmarks for Llama 3.3 Instruct

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 77.7 254 58th
SWE-bench Verified 63.7 239 60th
HumanEval 82.1 185 69th
MATH-500 81.9 168 72th
AIME 2025 76.9 131 78th
LiveCodeBench 67.1 247 59th
IFEval 85.4 176 71th
TruthfulQA 79.0 219 64th
HellaSwag 86.9 182 70th
MMMU 72.0 245 59th
Arena Elo 1418.0 157 74th

FAQ

What score does Llama 3.3 Instruct get on GPQA Diamond?

Llama 3.3 Instruct scores 70.1 on GPQA Diamond in this index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the top score is 87.0.

How does Llama 3.3 Instruct rank on GPQA Diamond?

It ranks #257 of 600 models, in the 57th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Is Llama 3.3 Instruct good at GPQA Diamond?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the GPQA Diamond score calculated?

GPQA Diamond is a reasoning benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 3.3 Instruct cost?

Llama 3.3 Instruct costs $4.33 per million input tokens and $19.59 per million output tokens.

Related