Coding · Baseten

Llama 3 Baseten 1.5B on SWE-bench Verified: score, rank and what it means

Llama 3 Baseten 1.5B scores 34.1 on SWE-bench Verified, placing it #564 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 57.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 81.7.

Score
34.1
0–100 scale
Rank
#564
of 600
Percentile
6th
within the index
Benchmark avg
57.5
all models
Leader
81.7
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
47.6
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on SWE-bench Verified, with Llama 3 Baseten 1.5B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 81.7
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 81.1
GPT-5.2 Max 80.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 80.2
GPT-5.2 80.2
GPT-5.1 Pro 80.1
o4 Max 79.8
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 79.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 79.5
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 79.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
3 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2
5 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
6 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
7 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On SWE-bench Verified, Llama 3 Baseten 1.5B sits at #564 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 81.7, so the gap to the top is 47.6 points. The median model in this index scores 61.0, which puts Llama 3 Baseten 1.5B below the midpoint.

Baseten models average 53.3 on this benchmark. Llama 3 Baseten 1.5B is 19.2 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Baseten model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 39.0. Llama 3 Baseten 1.5B is 4.9 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 34.1 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $0.42 per million input tokens, Llama 3 Baseten 1.5B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on SWE-bench Verified. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 3.1 Turbo 1.5B Together AI 16384 $0.46 49.8
Mistral Small 3 1.5B Mistral AI 32768 $0.42 49.2
Command R+ 1.5B Cohere 32768 $0.51 50.0
Hunyuan-Large 1.5B Tencent 8192 $0.54 50.5
Llama 3 Baseten 1.5B Baseten 4096 $0.42 48.2
Codestral 1.5B Mistral AI 8192 $0.52 49.9
Llama 3 Modal 1.5B Modal 4096 $0.42 49.7

Other benchmarks for Llama 3 Baseten 1.5B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 56.5 563 6th
GPQA Diamond 44.3 568 5th
HumanEval 49.6 575 4th
MATH-500 47.1 574 4th
AIME 2025 35.2 566 6th
LiveCodeBench 31.9 580 3th
IFEval 59.6 574 4th
TruthfulQA 56.9 552 8th
HellaSwag 68.1 556 7th
MMMU 46.8 572 5th
Arena Elo 1182.4 573 5th

FAQ

What score does Llama 3 Baseten 1.5B get on SWE-bench Verified?

Llama 3 Baseten 1.5B scores 34.1 on SWE-bench Verified in this index. The benchmark average is 57.5 and the top score is 81.7.

How does Llama 3 Baseten 1.5B rank on SWE-bench Verified?

It ranks #564 of 600 models, in the 6th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 81.7.

Is Llama 3 Baseten 1.5B good at SWE-bench Verified?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the SWE-bench Verified score calculated?

SWE-bench Verified is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 3 Baseten 1.5B cost?

Llama 3 Baseten 1.5B costs $0.42 per million input tokens and $2.01 per million output tokens.

Related