Coding · Baseten

Llama 3 Baseten Instruct on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means

Llama 3 Baseten Instruct scores 78.6 on HumanEval, placing it #273 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Score
78.6
0–100 scale
Rank
#273
of 600
Percentile
55th
within the index
Benchmark avg
74.0
all models
Leader
96.8
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
18.2
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with Llama 3 Baseten Instruct highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 96.8
Gemini 3 Pro Pro 95.0
o4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 93.8
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
GPT-5.2 Max 93.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 93.4
Grok 4 Max 93.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 93.2
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 92.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Gemini 3 Pro Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $19.80 87.3
3 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
4 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
5 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
8 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
9 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
10 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3

What this score means

On HumanEval, Llama 3 Baseten Instruct sits at #273 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 18.2 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts Llama 3 Baseten Instruct above the midpoint.

Baseten models average 68.7 on this benchmark. Llama 3 Baseten Instruct is 9.9 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Baseten model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 82.2. Llama 3 Baseten Instruct is 3.6 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 78.6 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $3.91 per million input tokens, Llama 3 Baseten Instruct is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 3 Modal Modal 32768 $3.82 74.9
GLM-4.5 Base Zhipu AI 32768 $3.99 74.9
Mixtral Groq Groq 16384 $3.37 73.1
Sonar Turbo Perplexity 65536 $10.71 75.7
Llama 3 Baseten Instruct Baseten 200000 $3.91 76.2
Llama 3 Lambda Instruct Lambda 32768 $3.92 75.8
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI 32768 $3.90 75.3

Other benchmarks for Llama 3 Baseten Instruct

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 80.0 182 70th
GPQA Diamond 73.9 171 72th
SWE-bench Verified 62.8 257 57th
MATH-500 77.4 269 55th
AIME 2025 74.7 159 74th
LiveCodeBench 70.1 189 69th
IFEval 83.1 241 60th
TruthfulQA 79.3 205 66th
HellaSwag 86.8 184 69th
MMMU 72.0 244 59th
Arena Elo 1397.8 214 64th

FAQ

What score does Llama 3 Baseten Instruct get on HumanEval?

Llama 3 Baseten Instruct scores 78.6 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.

How does Llama 3 Baseten Instruct rank on HumanEval?

It ranks #273 of 600 models, in the 55th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Is Llama 3 Baseten Instruct good at HumanEval?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HumanEval score calculated?

HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 3 Baseten Instruct cost?

Llama 3 Baseten Instruct costs $3.91 per million input tokens and $20.18 per million output tokens.

Related