Llama 3 Hyperbolic Chat on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means
Llama 3 Hyperbolic Chat scores 79.8 on HumanEval, placing it #239 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.
Score distribution
The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with Llama 3 Hyperbolic Chat highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.
Top 10 leaderboard
| # | Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.2 Pro | OpenAI | 2000000 | $21.32 | 89.6 |
| 2 | Gemini 3 Pro Pro | Google DeepMind | 200000 | $19.80 | 87.3 |
| 3 | o4 Max | OpenAI | 2000000 | $19.51 | 86.2 |
| 4 | Grok 4 Reasoning | xAI | 2000000 | $19.67 | 87.8 |
| 5 | Claude Opus 4.5 | Anthropic | 400000 | $19.42 | 87.7 |
| 6 | GPT-5.2 Max | OpenAI | 1000000 | $21.39 | 89.2 |
| 7 | Claude Opus 4.5 Pro | Anthropic | 200000 | $20.98 | 89.1 |
| 8 | Grok 4 Max | xAI | 2000000 | $19.70 | 86.6 |
| 9 | GPT-5.2 Turbo | OpenAI | 1000000 | $20.73 | 87.4 |
| 10 | GPT-5.1 Reasoning | OpenAI | 400000 | $20.27 | 88.3 |
What this score means
On HumanEval, Llama 3 Hyperbolic Chat sits at #239 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 17.0 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts Llama 3 Hyperbolic Chat above the midpoint.
Hyperbolic models average 68.8 on this benchmark. Llama 3 Hyperbolic Chat is 11.0 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Hyperbolic model.
Among multimodal models, the average is 82.2. Llama 3 Hyperbolic Chat is 2.4 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.
Read a 79.8 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.
Price context
At $3.64 per million input tokens, Llama 3 Hyperbolic Chat is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.
| Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3 Lambda Chat | Lambda | 32768 | $3.73 | 74.7 |
| MiniMax-Text Base | MiniMax | 128000 | $3.66 | 74.9 |
| Seed-OSS Chat | ByteDance | 65536 | $3.49 | 74.4 |
| Llama 3 Anyscale | Anyscale | 65536 | $3.94 | 74.7 |
| Llama 3 Hyperbolic Chat | Hyperbolic | 200000 | $3.64 | 75.1 |
| Codestral Base | Mistral AI | 8192 | $3.31 | 73.1 |
| GPT-5.2 Nano | OpenAI | 128000 | $9.73 | 73.5 |
Other benchmarks for Llama 3 Hyperbolic Chat
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Percentile | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 76.4 | 293 | 51th | |
| GPQA Diamond | 72.7 | 204 | 66th | |
| SWE-bench Verified | 61.8 | 284 | 53th | |
| MATH-500 | 79.2 | 228 | 62th | |
| AIME 2025 | 73.4 | 199 | 67th | |
| LiveCodeBench | 69.0 | 207 | 66th | |
| IFEval | 81.2 | 296 | 51th | |
| TruthfulQA | 77.7 | 263 | 56th | |
| HellaSwag | 84.8 | 256 | 57th | |
| MMMU | 70.5 | 281 | 53th | |
| Arena Elo | 1375.5 | 291 | 52th |
FAQ
What score does Llama 3 Hyperbolic Chat get on HumanEval?
Llama 3 Hyperbolic Chat scores 79.8 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.
How does Llama 3 Hyperbolic Chat rank on HumanEval?
It ranks #239 of 600 models, in the 60th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.
Is Llama 3 Hyperbolic Chat good at HumanEval?
Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.
How is the HumanEval score calculated?
HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.
What does Llama 3 Hyperbolic Chat cost?
Llama 3 Hyperbolic Chat costs $3.64 per million input tokens and $16.55 per million output tokens.