Llama 3 Lambda Chat on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means
Llama 3 Lambda Chat scores 79.9 on HumanEval, placing it #235 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.
Score distribution
The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with Llama 3 Lambda Chat highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.
Top 10 leaderboard
| # | Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.2 Pro | OpenAI | 2000000 | $21.32 | 89.6 |
| 2 | Gemini 3 Pro Pro | Google DeepMind | 200000 | $19.80 | 87.3 |
| 3 | o4 Max | OpenAI | 2000000 | $19.51 | 86.2 |
| 4 | Grok 4 Reasoning | xAI | 2000000 | $19.67 | 87.8 |
| 5 | Claude Opus 4.5 | Anthropic | 400000 | $19.42 | 87.7 |
| 6 | GPT-5.2 Max | OpenAI | 1000000 | $21.39 | 89.2 |
| 7 | Claude Opus 4.5 Pro | Anthropic | 200000 | $20.98 | 89.1 |
| 8 | Grok 4 Max | xAI | 2000000 | $19.70 | 86.6 |
| 9 | GPT-5.2 Turbo | OpenAI | 1000000 | $20.73 | 87.4 |
| 10 | GPT-5.1 Reasoning | OpenAI | 400000 | $20.27 | 88.3 |
What this score means
On HumanEval, Llama 3 Lambda Chat sits at #235 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 16.9 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts Llama 3 Lambda Chat above the midpoint.
Lambda models average 69.6 on this benchmark. Llama 3 Lambda Chat is 10.3 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Lambda model.
Among multimodal models, the average is 82.2. Llama 3 Lambda Chat is 2.3 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.
Read a 79.9 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.
Price context
At $3.73 per million input tokens, Llama 3 Lambda Chat is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.
| Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mistral Small 3 Chat | Mistral AI | 200000 | $3.54 | 73.7 |
| Reka Flash | Reka AI | 128000 | $9.95 | 74.1 |
| MiniMax-M2 Base | MiniMax | 65536 | $4.20 | 76.4 |
| Yi-Lightning Chat | 01.AI | 32768 | $3.79 | 75.5 |
| Llama 3 Lambda Chat | Lambda | 32768 | $3.73 | 74.7 |
| MiniMax-Text Base | MiniMax | 128000 | $3.66 | 74.9 |
| Seed-OSS Chat | ByteDance | 65536 | $3.49 | 74.4 |
Other benchmarks for Llama 3 Lambda Chat
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Percentile | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 76.8 | 282 | 53th | |
| GPQA Diamond | 71.4 | 232 | 61th | |
| SWE-bench Verified | 64.2 | 228 | 62th | |
| MATH-500 | 75.6 | 311 | 48th | |
| AIME 2025 | 73.3 | 200 | 67th | |
| LiveCodeBench | 64.5 | 306 | 49th | |
| IFEval | 80.8 | 316 | 47th | |
| TruthfulQA | 77.0 | 283 | 53th | |
| HellaSwag | 86.2 | 208 | 65th | |
| MMMU | 72.3 | 234 | 61th | |
| Arena Elo | 1378.6 | 278 | 54th |
FAQ
What score does Llama 3 Lambda Chat get on HumanEval?
Llama 3 Lambda Chat scores 79.9 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.
How does Llama 3 Lambda Chat rank on HumanEval?
It ranks #235 of 600 models, in the 61st percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.
Is Llama 3 Lambda Chat good at HumanEval?
Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.
How is the HumanEval score calculated?
HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.
What does Llama 3 Lambda Chat cost?
Llama 3 Lambda Chat costs $3.73 per million input tokens and $17.52 per million output tokens.