Coding · Modal

Llama 3 Modal Base on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means

Llama 3 Modal Base scores 78.9 on HumanEval, placing it #268 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Score
78.9
0–100 scale
Rank
#268
of 600
Percentile
55th
within the index
Benchmark avg
74.0
all models
Leader
96.8
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
17.9
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with Llama 3 Modal Base highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 96.8
Gemini 3 Pro Pro 95.0
o4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 93.8
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
GPT-5.2 Max 93.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 93.4
Grok 4 Max 93.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 93.2
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 92.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Gemini 3 Pro Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $19.80 87.3
3 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
4 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
5 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
8 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
9 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
10 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3

What this score means

On HumanEval, Llama 3 Modal Base sits at #268 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 17.9 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts Llama 3 Modal Base above the midpoint.

Modal models average 68.9 on this benchmark. Llama 3 Modal Base is 10.0 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Modal model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 72.4. Llama 3 Modal Base is 6.5 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 78.9 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $3.21 per million input tokens, Llama 3 Modal Base is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Yi-Lightning Instruct 01.AI 128000 $4.16 76.5
Gemini 2.5 Pro Mini Google DeepMind 128000 $10.07 74.2
Sonar Pro Perplexity 65536 $11.25 77.1
GPT-4.1 Mini OpenAI 128000 $10.43 74.3
Llama 3 Modal Base Modal 16384 $3.21 72.2
Llama 3 Modal Modal 32768 $3.82 74.9
GLM-4.5 Base Zhipu AI 32768 $3.99 74.9

Other benchmarks for Llama 3 Modal Base

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 76.6 288 52th
GPQA Diamond 66.2 340 43th
SWE-bench Verified 60.1 325 46th
MATH-500 75.8 305 49th
AIME 2025 64.9 338 44th
LiveCodeBench 65.1 291 52th
IFEval 79.7 340 43th
TruthfulQA 73.6 363 40th
HellaSwag 84.1 279 54th
MMMU 68.9 327 46th
Arena Elo 1363.9 336 44th

FAQ

What score does Llama 3 Modal Base get on HumanEval?

Llama 3 Modal Base scores 78.9 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.

How does Llama 3 Modal Base rank on HumanEval?

It ranks #268 of 600 models, in the 55th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Is Llama 3 Modal Base good at HumanEval?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HumanEval score calculated?

HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 3 Modal Base cost?

Llama 3 Modal Base costs $3.21 per million input tokens and $17.08 per million output tokens.

Related