Coding · Modal

Llama 3 Modal Instruct on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means

Llama 3 Modal Instruct scores 79.5 on HumanEval, placing it #248 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Score
79.5
0–100 scale
Rank
#248
of 600
Percentile
59th
within the index
Benchmark avg
74.0
all models
Leader
96.8
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
17.3
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with Llama 3 Modal Instruct highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 96.8
Gemini 3 Pro Pro 95.0
o4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 93.8
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
GPT-5.2 Max 93.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 93.4
Grok 4 Max 93.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 93.2
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 92.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Gemini 3 Pro Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $19.80 87.3
3 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
4 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
5 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
8 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
9 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
10 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3

What this score means

On HumanEval, Llama 3 Modal Instruct sits at #248 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 17.3 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts Llama 3 Modal Instruct above the midpoint.

Modal models average 68.9 on this benchmark. Llama 3 Modal Instruct is 10.6 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Modal model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 82.2. Llama 3 Modal Instruct is 2.7 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 79.5 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $3.84 per million input tokens, Llama 3 Modal Instruct is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Hunyuan-Large Base Tencent 200000 $3.64 74.0
Llama 3 Replicate Chat Replicate 200000 $3.74 74.7
Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct Groq 65536 $4.08 76.7
Llama 3 Anyscale Chat Anyscale 65536 $3.67 74.6
Llama 3 Modal Instruct Modal 128000 $3.84 75.2
Yi-Large Chat 01.AI 65536 $3.49 73.5
Command R+ Cohere 32768 $3.96 76.3

Other benchmarks for Llama 3 Modal Instruct

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 80.6 166 72th
GPQA Diamond 71.9 221 63th
SWE-bench Verified 63.6 244 59th
MATH-500 81.3 183 70th
AIME 2025 68.7 285 53th
LiveCodeBench 67.0 251 58th
IFEval 83.7 219 64th
TruthfulQA 78.6 233 61th
HellaSwag 83.5 305 49th
MMMU 69.2 323 46th
Arena Elo 1407.2 189 69th

FAQ

What score does Llama 3 Modal Instruct get on HumanEval?

Llama 3 Modal Instruct scores 79.5 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.

How does Llama 3 Modal Instruct rank on HumanEval?

It ranks #248 of 600 models, in the 59th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Is Llama 3 Modal Instruct good at HumanEval?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HumanEval score calculated?

HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 3 Modal Instruct cost?

Llama 3 Modal Instruct costs $3.84 per million input tokens and $18.84 per million output tokens.

Related