Coding · Modal

Llama 3 Modal on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means

Llama 3 Modal scores 78.8 on HumanEval, placing it #269 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Score
78.8
0–100 scale
Rank
#269
of 600
Percentile
55th
within the index
Benchmark avg
74.0
all models
Leader
96.8
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
18.0
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with Llama 3 Modal highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 96.8
Gemini 3 Pro Pro 95.0
o4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 93.8
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
GPT-5.2 Max 93.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 93.4
Grok 4 Max 93.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 93.2
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 92.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Gemini 3 Pro Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $19.80 87.3
3 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
4 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
5 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
8 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
9 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
10 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3

What this score means

On HumanEval, Llama 3 Modal sits at #269 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 18.0 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts Llama 3 Modal above the midpoint.

Modal models average 68.9 on this benchmark. Llama 3 Modal is 9.9 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Modal model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 82.2. Llama 3 Modal is 3.4 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 78.8 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $3.82 per million input tokens, Llama 3 Modal is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Gemini 2.5 Pro Mini Google DeepMind 128000 $10.07 74.2
Sonar Pro Perplexity 65536 $11.25 77.1
GPT-4.1 Mini OpenAI 128000 $10.43 74.3
Llama 3 Modal Base Modal 16384 $3.21 72.2
Llama 3 Modal Modal 32768 $3.82 74.9
GLM-4.5 Base Zhipu AI 32768 $3.99 74.9
Mixtral Groq Groq 16384 $3.37 73.1

Other benchmarks for Llama 3 Modal

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 76.4 294 51th
GPQA Diamond 71.0 238 60th
SWE-bench Verified 63.6 243 60th
MATH-500 79.1 232 61th
AIME 2025 70.8 240 60th
LiveCodeBench 67.4 240 60th
IFEval 81.4 292 51th
TruthfulQA 79.5 202 66th
HellaSwag 84.1 278 54th
MMMU 71.6 251 58th
Arena Elo 1391.4 244 59th

FAQ

What score does Llama 3 Modal get on HumanEval?

Llama 3 Modal scores 78.8 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.

How does Llama 3 Modal rank on HumanEval?

It ranks #269 of 600 models, in the 55th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Is Llama 3 Modal good at HumanEval?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HumanEval score calculated?

HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 3 Modal cost?

Llama 3 Modal costs $3.82 per million input tokens and $17.80 per million output tokens.

Related