Reasoning · Meta AI

Llama 4 Maverick Chat on GPQA Diamond: score, rank and what it means

Llama 4 Maverick Chat scores 73.0 on GPQA Diamond, placing it #199 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Score
73.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#199
of 600
Percentile
67th
within the index
Benchmark avg
65.6
all models
Leader
87.0
GPT-5.2 Reasoning
Gap to leader
14.0
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on GPQA Diamond, with Llama 4 Maverick Chat highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Reasoning 87.0
GPT-5.1 Max 86.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 86.0
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 85.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.2 84.9
o4 Turbo 84.8
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 84.6
Grok 4 Turbo 84.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
7 o4 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.34 86.6
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
10 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2

What this score means

On GPQA Diamond, Llama 4 Maverick Chat sits at #199 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Reasoning, scores 87.0, so the gap to the top is 14.0 points. The median model in this index scores 68.8, which puts Llama 4 Maverick Chat above the midpoint.

Meta AI models average 64.6 on this benchmark. Llama 4 Maverick Chat is 8.4 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Meta AI model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 73.5. Llama 4 Maverick Chat is 0.5 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 73.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $5.09 per million input tokens, Llama 4 Maverick Chat is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on GPQA Diamond. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 3.3 Meta AI 128000 $4.56 78.2
Doubao 1.5 Pro ByteDance 200000 $13.65 79.7
Sonar Turbo Perplexity 65536 $10.71 75.7
ERNIE 4.5 Turbo Baidu 128000 $13.75 79.7
Llama 4 Maverick Chat Meta AI 128000 $5.09 79.7
Yi-Lightning Instruct 01.AI 128000 $4.16 76.5
GLM-4.6 Chat Zhipu AI 400000 $4.89 79.8

Other benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick Chat

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 80.5 169 72th
SWE-bench Verified 66.6 177 71th
HumanEval 83.2 157 74th
MATH-500 84.8 113 81th
AIME 2025 78.9 102 83th
LiveCodeBench 76.3 80 87th
IFEval 87.4 123 80th
TruthfulQA 81.5 142 76th
HellaSwag 88.8 119 80th
MMMU 75.4 155 74th
Arena Elo 1419.9 150 75th

FAQ

What score does Llama 4 Maverick Chat get on GPQA Diamond?

Llama 4 Maverick Chat scores 73.0 on GPQA Diamond in this index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the top score is 87.0.

How does Llama 4 Maverick Chat rank on GPQA Diamond?

It ranks #199 of 600 models, in the 67th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Is Llama 4 Maverick Chat good at GPQA Diamond?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the GPQA Diamond score calculated?

GPQA Diamond is a reasoning benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 4 Maverick Chat cost?

Llama 4 Maverick Chat costs $5.09 per million input tokens and $23.20 per million output tokens.

Related