Coding · Meta AI

Llama 4 Scout 8B on SWE-bench Verified: score, rank and what it means

Llama 4 Scout 8B scores 48.1 on SWE-bench Verified, placing it #436 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 57.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 81.7.

Score
48.1
0–100 scale
Rank
#436
of 600
Percentile
27th
within the index
Benchmark avg
57.5
all models
Leader
81.7
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
33.6
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on SWE-bench Verified, with Llama 4 Scout 8B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 81.7
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 81.1
GPT-5.2 Max 80.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 80.2
GPT-5.2 80.2
GPT-5.1 Pro 80.1
o4 Max 79.8
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 79.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 79.5
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 79.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
3 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2
5 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
6 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
7 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On SWE-bench Verified, Llama 4 Scout 8B sits at #436 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 81.7, so the gap to the top is 33.6 points. The median model in this index scores 61.0, which puts Llama 4 Scout 8B below the midpoint.

Meta AI models average 56.9 on this benchmark. Llama 4 Scout 8B is 8.8 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Meta AI model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 39.0. Llama 4 Scout 8B is 9.1 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 48.1 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $1.46 per million input tokens, Llama 4 Scout 8B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on SWE-bench Verified. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Firesearch Mini Fireworks AI 32768 $3.94 61.5
Reka Flash Nano Reka AI 16384 $3.93 61.0
GLM-4.5 8B Zhipu AI 32768 $1.46 61.3
Sonar Nano Perplexity 4096 $4.37 61.9
Llama 4 Scout 8B Meta AI 8192 $1.46 61.2
GPT-NeoX Base EleutherAI 16384 $1.22 59.7
Magistral 8B Mistral AI 4096 $1.33 60.0

Other benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout 8B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 67.5 425 29th
GPQA Diamond 58.9 418 30th
HumanEval 66.3 426 29th
MATH-500 62.7 439 27th
AIME 2025 50.2 458 24th
LiveCodeBench 49.7 452 25th
IFEval 71.8 430 28th
TruthfulQA 65.8 446 26th
HellaSwag 73.7 462 23th
MMMU 58.1 457 24th
Arena Elo 1266.8 466 22th

FAQ

What score does Llama 4 Scout 8B get on SWE-bench Verified?

Llama 4 Scout 8B scores 48.1 on SWE-bench Verified in this index. The benchmark average is 57.5 and the top score is 81.7.

How does Llama 4 Scout 8B rank on SWE-bench Verified?

It ranks #436 of 600 models, in the 27th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 81.7.

Is Llama 4 Scout 8B good at SWE-bench Verified?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the SWE-bench Verified score calculated?

SWE-bench Verified is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 4 Scout 8B cost?

Llama 4 Scout 8B costs $1.46 per million input tokens and $6.51 per million output tokens.

Related