Reasoning · Meta AI

Llama 4 Scout Base on GPQA Diamond: score, rank and what it means

Llama 4 Scout Base scores 70.5 on GPQA Diamond, placing it #251 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Score
70.5
0–100 scale
Rank
#251
of 600
Percentile
58th
within the index
Benchmark avg
65.6
all models
Leader
87.0
GPT-5.2 Reasoning
Gap to leader
16.5
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on GPQA Diamond, with Llama 4 Scout Base highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Reasoning 87.0
GPT-5.1 Max 86.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 86.0
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 85.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.2 84.9
o4 Turbo 84.8
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 84.6
Grok 4 Turbo 84.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
7 o4 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.34 86.6
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
10 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2

What this score means

On GPQA Diamond, Llama 4 Scout Base sits at #251 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Reasoning, scores 87.0, so the gap to the top is 16.5 points. The median model in this index scores 68.8, which puts Llama 4 Scout Base above the midpoint.

Meta AI models average 64.6 on this benchmark. Llama 4 Scout Base is 5.9 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Meta AI model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 73.5. Llama 4 Scout Base is 3.0 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 70.5 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $3.95 per million input tokens, Llama 4 Scout Base is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on GPQA Diamond. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Mixtral Chat Mistral AI 65536 $3.30 72.6
Claude 3.7 Sonnet Mini Anthropic 32768 $9.74 73.0
Command R+ Cohere 32768 $3.96 76.3
Command R+ Instruct Cohere 200000 $4.16 76.2
Llama 4 Scout Base Meta AI 32768 $3.95 75.3
Codestral Base Mistral AI 8192 $3.31 73.1
Reka Flash Reasoning Reka AI 32768 $10.70 75.6

Other benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout Base

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 80.7 158 74th
SWE-bench Verified 65.1 213 65th
HumanEval 81.1 211 65th
MATH-500 78.4 250 58th
AIME 2025 68.2 293 51th
LiveCodeBench 67.6 234 61th
IFEval 82.3 268 55th
TruthfulQA 79.8 189 69th
HellaSwag 83.6 300 50th
MMMU 71.5 257 57th
Arena Elo 1395.6 225 63th

FAQ

What score does Llama 4 Scout Base get on GPQA Diamond?

Llama 4 Scout Base scores 70.5 on GPQA Diamond in this index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the top score is 87.0.

How does Llama 4 Scout Base rank on GPQA Diamond?

It ranks #251 of 600 models, in the 58th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Is Llama 4 Scout Base good at GPQA Diamond?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the GPQA Diamond score calculated?

GPQA Diamond is a reasoning benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 4 Scout Base cost?

Llama 4 Scout Base costs $3.95 per million input tokens and $18.97 per million output tokens.

Related