Mathematics · Mistral AI

Magistral Chat on MATH-500: score, rank and what it means

Magistral Chat scores 83.8 on MATH-500, placing it #128 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Score
83.8
0–100 scale
Rank
#128
of 600
Percentile
79th
within the index
Benchmark avg
72.5
all models
Leader
96.7
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
12.9
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MATH-500, with Magistral Chat highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.1 Pro 95.1
o4 Reasoning 94.8
Grok 4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 94.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.2
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 93.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo 93.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
5 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
9 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo Anthropic 2000000 $19.57 85.7

What this score means

On MATH-500, Magistral Chat sits at #128 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.7, so the gap to the top is 12.9 points. The median model in this index scores 76.0, which puts Magistral Chat above the midpoint.

Mistral AI models average 69.1 on this benchmark. Magistral Chat is 14.7 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Mistral AI model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 81.3. Magistral Chat is 2.5 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 83.8 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.33 per million input tokens, Magistral Chat is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MATH-500. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
QwQ Instruct Alibaba Cloud 65536 $4.62 79.0
Sonar Pro Turbo Perplexity 128000 $13.55 79.0
Qwen3 Base Alibaba Cloud 65536 $4.33 77.4
GLM-4.6 Base Zhipu AI 128000 $4.53 78.5
Magistral Chat Mistral AI 128000 $4.33 76.8
Nova Pro Max Amazon 1000000 $14.05 81.2
Reka Core Reka AI 32768 $12.17 77.4

Other benchmarks for Magistral Chat

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 77.9 246 59th
GPQA Diamond 72.3 214 64th
SWE-bench Verified 64.5 222 63th
HumanEval 81.3 207 66th
AIME 2025 73.7 192 68th
LiveCodeBench 67.5 238 60th
IFEval 83.5 231 62th
TruthfulQA 82.3 124 79th
HellaSwag 86.1 213 65th
MMMU 72.0 246 59th
Arena Elo 1397.1 217 64th

FAQ

What score does Magistral Chat get on MATH-500?

Magistral Chat scores 83.8 on MATH-500 in this index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the top score is 96.7.

How does Magistral Chat rank on MATH-500?

It ranks #128 of 600 models, in the 79th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Is Magistral Chat good at MATH-500?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MATH-500 score calculated?

MATH-500 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Magistral Chat cost?

Magistral Chat costs $4.33 per million input tokens and $16.06 per million output tokens.

Related