Multimodal · Mistral AI

Magistral on MMMU: score, rank and what it means

Magistral scores 77.4 on MMMU, placing it #109 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Score
77.4
0–100 scale
Rank
#109
of 600
Percentile
82th
within the index
Benchmark avg
67.1
all models
Leader
86.9
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
9.5
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMMU, with Magistral highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 86.9
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 86.2
GPT-5.2 85.3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.1 Max 85.1
Grok 4 Pro 84.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro 84.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.4
GPT-5.2 Vision 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
5 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
6 Grok 4 Pro xAI 1000000 $19.00 85.4
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $18.73 86.7
9 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
10 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4

What this score means

On MMMU, Magistral sits at #109 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 86.9, so the gap to the top is 9.5 points. The median model in this index scores 70.0, which puts Magistral above the midpoint.

Mistral AI models average 64.8 on this benchmark. Magistral is 12.6 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Mistral AI model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 74.3. Magistral is 3.1 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 77.4 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.75 per million input tokens, Magistral is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMMU. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
GPT-4.1 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $16.97 83.8
GPT-4.1 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $14.88 82.0
Kimi K2 Moonshot AI 128000 $5.85 83.0
Reka Core Max Reka AI 128000 $13.41 79.3
Magistral Mistral AI 200000 $4.75 79.8
Qwen3 Chat Alibaba Cloud 128000 $4.75 79.1
Command A Pro Cohere 200000 $14.28 81.3

Other benchmarks for Magistral

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 82.1 120 80th
GPQA Diamond 75.8 126 79th
SWE-bench Verified 66.5 179 70th
HumanEval 85.1 111 82th
MATH-500 85.4 101 83th
AIME 2025 74.2 174 71th
LiveCodeBench 75.3 92 85th
IFEval 86.1 152 75th
TruthfulQA 82.0 129 79th
HellaSwag 87.9 146 76th
Arena Elo 1427.8 125 79th

FAQ

What score does Magistral get on MMMU?

Magistral scores 77.4 on MMMU in this index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the top score is 86.9.

How does Magistral rank on MMMU?

It ranks #109 of 600 models, in the 82nd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Is Magistral good at MMMU?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMMU score calculated?

MMMU is a multimodal benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Magistral cost?

Magistral costs $4.75 per million input tokens and $21.16 per million output tokens.

Related