Mathematics · MiniMax

MiniMax-M2 1.5B on MATH-500: score, rank and what it means

MiniMax-M2 1.5B scores 53.5 on MATH-500, placing it #530 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Score
53.5
0–100 scale
Rank
#530
of 600
Percentile
12th
within the index
Benchmark avg
72.5
all models
Leader
96.7
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
43.2
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MATH-500, with MiniMax-M2 1.5B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.1 Pro 95.1
o4 Reasoning 94.8
Grok 4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 94.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.2
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 93.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo 93.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
5 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
9 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo Anthropic 2000000 $19.57 85.7

What this score means

On MATH-500, MiniMax-M2 1.5B sits at #530 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.7, so the gap to the top is 43.2 points. The median model in this index scores 76.0, which puts MiniMax-M2 1.5B below the midpoint.

MiniMax models average 71.1 on this benchmark. MiniMax-M2 1.5B is 17.6 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average MiniMax model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 53.7. MiniMax-M2 1.5B is 0.2 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 53.5 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $0.84 per million input tokens, MiniMax-M2 1.5B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MATH-500. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Qwen3 1.5B Alibaba Cloud 4096 $0.84 53.5
MiniMax-Text 1.5B MiniMax 32768 $0.58 51.5
Mixtral Groq 8B Groq 32768 $0.77 54.8
Yi-Large 8B 01.AI 32768 $0.88 56.1
MiniMax-M2 1.5B MiniMax 16384 $0.84 54.6
GLM-4.5 1.5B Zhipu AI 16384 $0.65 53.3
Kimi K1.5 1.5B Moonshot AI 4096 $0.75 53.2

Other benchmarks for MiniMax-M2 1.5B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 59.6 531 12th
GPQA Diamond 49.9 525 13th
SWE-bench Verified 42.8 492 18th
HumanEval 58.3 520 13th
AIME 2025 39.6 543 10th
LiveCodeBench 41.5 530 12th
IFEval 65.9 521 13th
TruthfulQA 63.0 492 18th
HellaSwag 72.0 500 17th
MMMU 54.6 501 17th
Arena Elo 1238.4 516 14th

FAQ

What score does MiniMax-M2 1.5B get on MATH-500?

MiniMax-M2 1.5B scores 53.5 on MATH-500 in this index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the top score is 96.7.

How does MiniMax-M2 1.5B rank on MATH-500?

It ranks #530 of 600 models, in the 12th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Is MiniMax-M2 1.5B good at MATH-500?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MATH-500 score calculated?

MATH-500 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does MiniMax-M2 1.5B cost?

MiniMax-M2 1.5B costs $0.84 per million input tokens and $2.96 per million output tokens.

Related