Instruction following · MiniMax

MiniMax-M2 8B on IFEval: score, rank and what it means

MiniMax-M2 8B scores 71.8 on IFEval, placing it #431 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 78.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 96.1.

Score
71.8
0–100 scale
Rank
#431
of 600
Percentile
28th
within the index
Benchmark avg
78.6
all models
Leader
96.1
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
24.3
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on IFEval, with MiniMax-M2 8B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 96.1
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.6
GPT-5.2 Max 95.2
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 95.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 94.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 94.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.5
o4 Reasoning 94.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
5 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
6 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
7 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
8 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5

What this score means

On IFEval, MiniMax-M2 8B sits at #431 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 24.3 points. The median model in this index scores 81.2, which puts MiniMax-M2 8B below the midpoint.

MiniMax models average 78.1 on this benchmark. MiniMax-M2 8B is 6.3 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average MiniMax model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 64.9. MiniMax-M2 8B is 6.9 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 71.8 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $1.65 per million input tokens, MiniMax-M2 8B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on IFEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Kimi K1.5 7B Moonshot AI 8192 $1.35 59.9
Pythia Instruct EleutherAI 8192 $1.41 60.8
MiniMax-M2 7B MiniMax 8192 $1.44 60.8
Llama 4 Scout 8B Meta AI 8192 $1.46 61.2
MiniMax-M2 8B MiniMax 32768 $1.65 61.7
Zephyr Chat Hugging Face 4096 $1.49 61.3
Zephyr Instruct Hugging Face 4096 $1.66 62.4

Other benchmarks for MiniMax-M2 8B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 65.4 446 26th
GPQA Diamond 56.9 442 26th
SWE-bench Verified 50.0 423 30th
HumanEval 65.8 433 28th
MATH-500 62.2 441 27th
AIME 2025 53.4 429 29th
LiveCodeBench 50.0 448 25th
TruthfulQA 67.5 425 29th
HellaSwag 76.2 425 29th
MMMU 59.0 440 27th
Arena Elo 1300.9 419 30th

FAQ

What score does MiniMax-M2 8B get on IFEval?

MiniMax-M2 8B scores 71.8 on IFEval in this index. The benchmark average is 78.6 and the top score is 96.1.

How does MiniMax-M2 8B rank on IFEval?

It ranks #431 of 600 models, in the 28th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 96.1.

Is MiniMax-M2 8B good at IFEval?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the IFEval score calculated?

IFEval is a instruction following benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does MiniMax-M2 8B cost?

MiniMax-M2 8B costs $1.65 per million input tokens and $8.35 per million output tokens.

Related