Knowledge · MiniMax

MiniMax-M2 Chat on MMLU-Pro: score, rank and what it means

MiniMax-M2 Chat scores 84.3 on MMLU-Pro, placing it #75 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Score
84.3
0–100 scale
Rank
#75
of 600
Percentile
88th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.5
all models
Leader
91.6
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
7.3
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMLU-Pro, with MiniMax-M2 Chat highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 91.6
GPT-5.1 Max 91.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.2
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 90.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.1
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.5
GPT-5.2 Vision 89.5
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
5 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
6 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
7 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On MMLU-Pro, MiniMax-M2 Chat sits at #75 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 91.6, so the gap to the top is 7.3 points. The median model in this index scores 76.1, which puts MiniMax-M2 Chat above the midpoint.

MiniMax models average 72.7 on this benchmark. MiniMax-M2 Chat is 11.6 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average MiniMax model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 80.0. MiniMax-M2 Chat is 4.3 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 84.3 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $5.02 per million input tokens, MiniMax-M2 Chat is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMLU-Pro. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI 128000 $5.41 81.7
Grok 3 Reasoning xAI 200000 $16.07 82.9
Command A Max Cohere 400000 $14.28 79.9
DeepSeek-V3.2 Base DeepSeek 128000 $5.05 80.2
MiniMax-M2 Chat MiniMax 200000 $5.02 80.2
o3 Pro OpenAI 400000 $17.89 85.8
Nova Pro Max Amazon 1000000 $14.05 81.2

Other benchmarks for MiniMax-M2 Chat

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
GPQA Diamond 77.8 91 85th
SWE-bench Verified 66.4 182 70th
HumanEval 84.2 128 79th
MATH-500 86.0 93 85th
AIME 2025 78.3 109 82th
LiveCodeBench 70.4 184 69th
IFEval 88.0 102 83th
TruthfulQA 80.3 172 71th
HellaSwag 87.8 151 75th
MMMU 79.2 70 88th
Arena Elo 1443.0 93 85th

FAQ

What score does MiniMax-M2 Chat get on MMLU-Pro?

MiniMax-M2 Chat scores 84.3 on MMLU-Pro in this index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the top score is 91.6.

How does MiniMax-M2 Chat rank on MMLU-Pro?

It ranks #75 of 600 models, in the 88th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Is MiniMax-M2 Chat good at MMLU-Pro?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMLU-Pro score calculated?

MMLU-Pro is a knowledge benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does MiniMax-M2 Chat cost?

MiniMax-M2 Chat costs $5.02 per million input tokens and $18.95 per million output tokens.

Related