Reasoning · MiniMax

MiniMax-M2 Instruct on GPQA Diamond: score, rank and what it means

MiniMax-M2 Instruct scores 73.7 on GPQA Diamond, placing it #178 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Score
73.7
0–100 scale
Rank
#178
of 600
Percentile
70th
within the index
Benchmark avg
65.6
all models
Leader
87.0
GPT-5.2 Reasoning
Gap to leader
13.3
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on GPQA Diamond, with MiniMax-M2 Instruct highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Reasoning 87.0
GPT-5.1 Max 86.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 86.0
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 85.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.2 84.9
o4 Turbo 84.8
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 84.6
Grok 4 Turbo 84.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
7 o4 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.34 86.6
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
10 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2

What this score means

On GPQA Diamond, MiniMax-M2 Instruct sits at #178 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Reasoning, scores 87.0, so the gap to the top is 13.3 points. The median model in this index scores 68.8, which puts MiniMax-M2 Instruct above the midpoint.

MiniMax models average 65.1 on this benchmark. MiniMax-M2 Instruct is 8.6 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average MiniMax model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 73.5. MiniMax-M2 Instruct is 0.2 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 73.7 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $5.11 per million input tokens, MiniMax-M2 Instruct is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on GPQA Diamond. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Gemini 3 Flash Mini Google DeepMind 200000 $10.71 76.0
Llama 3 Novita Instruct Novita AI 32768 $3.94 75.6
Magistral Instruct Mistral AI 65536 $4.48 78.4
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI 32768 $3.90 75.3
MiniMax-M2 Instruct MiniMax 128000 $5.11 79.4
MiniMax-Text Chat MiniMax 128000 $4.26 77.8
Sonar Max Perplexity 32768 $11.60 77.8

Other benchmarks for MiniMax-M2 Instruct

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 82.1 121 80th
SWE-bench Verified 69.9 113 81th
HumanEval 86.7 95 84th
MATH-500 82.1 165 73th
AIME 2025 77.8 118 80th
LiveCodeBench 71.1 170 72th
IFEval 87.3 126 79th
TruthfulQA 80.0 178 70th
HellaSwag 88.5 125 79th
MMMU 74.1 189 69th
Arena Elo 1442.2 95 84th

FAQ

What score does MiniMax-M2 Instruct get on GPQA Diamond?

MiniMax-M2 Instruct scores 73.7 on GPQA Diamond in this index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the top score is 87.0.

How does MiniMax-M2 Instruct rank on GPQA Diamond?

It ranks #178 of 600 models, in the 70th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Is MiniMax-M2 Instruct good at GPQA Diamond?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the GPQA Diamond score calculated?

GPQA Diamond is a reasoning benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does MiniMax-M2 Instruct cost?

MiniMax-M2 Instruct costs $5.11 per million input tokens and $25.04 per million output tokens.

Related