Coding · NVIDIA

Nemotron Nano Instruct on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means

Nemotron Nano Instruct scores 72.9 on HumanEval, placing it #375 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Score
72.9
0–100 scale
Rank
#375
of 600
Percentile
38th
within the index
Benchmark avg
74.0
all models
Leader
96.8
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
23.9
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with Nemotron Nano Instruct highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 96.8
Gemini 3 Pro Pro 95.0
o4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 93.8
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
GPT-5.2 Max 93.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 93.4
Grok 4 Max 93.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 93.2
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 92.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Gemini 3 Pro Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $19.80 87.3
3 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
4 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
5 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
8 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
9 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
10 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3

What this score means

On HumanEval, Nemotron Nano Instruct sits at #375 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 23.9 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts Nemotron Nano Instruct below the midpoint.

NVIDIA models average 65.9 on this benchmark. Nemotron Nano Instruct is 7.0 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average NVIDIA model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 72.4. Nemotron Nano Instruct is 0.5 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 72.9 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $2.33 per million input tokens, Nemotron Nano Instruct is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Phi-3.5 Base Microsoft 65536 $2.24 66.6
Gemini 3 Flash Nano Google DeepMind 32768 $7.56 69.4
Firesearch Max Fireworks AI 8192 $7.80 69.9
Mixtral Turbo Base Together AI 32768 $2.53 69.7
Nemotron Nano Instruct NVIDIA 32768 $2.33 67.4
Claude 3.7 Sonnet Nano Anthropic 65536 $6.93 68.9
o3 Nano OpenAI 32768 $7.78 70.6

Other benchmarks for Nemotron Nano Instruct

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 72.6 371 38th
GPQA Diamond 64.7 366 39th
SWE-bench Verified 54.5 388 35th
MATH-500 67.4 404 33th
AIME 2025 58.6 396 34th
LiveCodeBench 57.1 395 34th
IFEval 75.2 396 34th
TruthfulQA 73.0 369 39th
HellaSwag 79.7 384 36th
MMMU 66.2 368 39th
Arena Elo 1331.2 387 36th

FAQ

What score does Nemotron Nano Instruct get on HumanEval?

Nemotron Nano Instruct scores 72.9 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.

How does Nemotron Nano Instruct rank on HumanEval?

It ranks #375 of 600 models, in the 38th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Is Nemotron Nano Instruct good at HumanEval?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HumanEval score calculated?

HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Nemotron Nano Instruct cost?

Nemotron Nano Instruct costs $2.33 per million input tokens and $11.92 per million output tokens.

Related