Commonsense · Amazon

Nova Lite Reasoning on HellaSwag: score, rank and what it means

Nova Lite Reasoning scores 84.0 on HellaSwag, placing it #282 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Score
84.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#282
of 600
Percentile
53th
within the index
Benchmark avg
81.4
all models
Leader
96.1
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
12.1
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HellaSwag, with Nova Lite Reasoning highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.1
GPT-5.2 Turbo 95.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 95.2
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 95.2
Grok 4 Reasoning 95.2
GPT-5.2 Vision 94.6
Gemini 3 Pro Turbo 94.6
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.4
o4 Pro 94.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
8 Gemini 3 Pro Turbo Google DeepMind 400000 $19.62 86.4
9 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
10 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3

What this score means

On HellaSwag, Nova Lite Reasoning sits at #282 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 12.1 points. The median model in this index scores 83.6, which puts Nova Lite Reasoning above the midpoint.

Amazon models average 83.7 on this benchmark. Nova Lite Reasoning is 0.3 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Amazon model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 86.8. Nova Lite Reasoning is 2.8 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 84.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $9.92 per million input tokens, Nova Lite Reasoning is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HellaSwag. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 3 Modal Modal 32768 $3.82 74.9
Llama 3 Modal Base Modal 16384 $3.21 72.2
OLMo 2 Instruct Allen Institute for AI 32768 $3.03 71.7
Firefunction Fireworks AI 16384 $8.16 72.3
Nova Lite Reasoning Amazon 32768 $9.92 74.3
Auto Turbo OpenRouter 65536 $7.96 70.9
Firefunction Max Fireworks AI 32768 $9.12 73.2

Other benchmarks for Nova Lite Reasoning

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 78.7 223 63th
GPQA Diamond 69.0 296 51th
SWE-bench Verified 62.4 270 55th
HumanEval 80.4 225 63th
MATH-500 78.6 248 59th
AIME 2025 66.7 321 47th
LiveCodeBench 65.7 281 53th
IFEval 83.5 233 61th
TruthfulQA 76.8 286 52th
MMMU 72.0 247 59th
Arena Elo 1371.0 313 48th

FAQ

What score does Nova Lite Reasoning get on HellaSwag?

Nova Lite Reasoning scores 84.0 on HellaSwag in this index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the top score is 96.1.

How does Nova Lite Reasoning rank on HellaSwag?

It ranks #282 of 600 models, in the 53rd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Is Nova Lite Reasoning good at HellaSwag?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HellaSwag score calculated?

HellaSwag is a commonsense benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Nova Lite Reasoning cost?

Nova Lite Reasoning costs $9.92 per million input tokens and $53.42 per million output tokens.

Related