Instruction following · Amazon

Nova Lite Reasoning on IFEval: score, rank and what it means

Nova Lite Reasoning scores 83.5 on IFEval, placing it #233 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 78.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 96.1.

Score
83.5
0–100 scale
Rank
#233
of 600
Percentile
61th
within the index
Benchmark avg
78.6
all models
Leader
96.1
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
12.6
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on IFEval, with Nova Lite Reasoning highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 96.1
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.6
GPT-5.2 Max 95.2
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 95.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 94.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 94.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.5
o4 Reasoning 94.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
5 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
6 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
7 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
8 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5

What this score means

On IFEval, Nova Lite Reasoning sits at #233 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 12.6 points. The median model in this index scores 81.2, which puts Nova Lite Reasoning above the midpoint.

Amazon models average 81.5 on this benchmark. Nova Lite Reasoning is 2.0 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Amazon model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 85.2. Nova Lite Reasoning is 1.7 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 83.5 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $9.92 per million input tokens, Nova Lite Reasoning is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on IFEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 3.1 Cerebras Chat Cerebras 32768 $4.07 76.0
Magistral Base Mistral AI 65536 $3.86 75.6
Magistral Chat Mistral AI 128000 $4.33 76.8
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI 32768 $3.90 75.3
Nova Lite Reasoning Amazon 32768 $9.92 74.3
Yi-Lightning Chat 01.AI 32768 $3.79 75.5
Qwen3-Max Mini Alibaba Cloud 128000 $11.13 76.5

Other benchmarks for Nova Lite Reasoning

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 78.7 223 63th
GPQA Diamond 69.0 296 51th
SWE-bench Verified 62.4 270 55th
HumanEval 80.4 225 63th
MATH-500 78.6 248 59th
AIME 2025 66.7 321 47th
LiveCodeBench 65.7 281 53th
TruthfulQA 76.8 286 52th
HellaSwag 84.0 282 53th
MMMU 72.0 247 59th
Arena Elo 1371.0 313 48th

FAQ

What score does Nova Lite Reasoning get on IFEval?

Nova Lite Reasoning scores 83.5 on IFEval in this index. The benchmark average is 78.6 and the top score is 96.1.

How does Nova Lite Reasoning rank on IFEval?

It ranks #233 of 600 models, in the 61st percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 96.1.

Is Nova Lite Reasoning good at IFEval?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the IFEval score calculated?

IFEval is a instruction following benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Nova Lite Reasoning cost?

Nova Lite Reasoning costs $9.92 per million input tokens and $53.42 per million output tokens.

Related