Commonsense · Amazon

Nova Lite Turbo on HellaSwag: score, rank and what it means

Nova Lite Turbo scores 85.0 on HellaSwag, placing it #248 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Score
85.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#248
of 600
Percentile
59th
within the index
Benchmark avg
81.4
all models
Leader
96.1
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
11.1
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HellaSwag, with Nova Lite Turbo highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.1
GPT-5.2 Turbo 95.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 95.2
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 95.2
Grok 4 Reasoning 95.2
GPT-5.2 Vision 94.6
Gemini 3 Pro Turbo 94.6
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.4
o4 Pro 94.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
8 Gemini 3 Pro Turbo Google DeepMind 400000 $19.62 86.4
9 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
10 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3

What this score means

On HellaSwag, Nova Lite Turbo sits at #248 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 11.1 points. The median model in this index scores 83.6, which puts Nova Lite Turbo above the midpoint.

Amazon models average 83.7 on this benchmark. Nova Lite Turbo is 1.3 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Amazon model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 79.8. Nova Lite Turbo is 5.2 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 85.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $9.14 per million input tokens, Nova Lite Turbo is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HellaSwag. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Hunyuan-Turbo Reasoning Tencent 128000 $11.89 77.5
Magistral Base Mistral AI 65536 $3.86 75.6
Mistral Small 3 Instruct Mistral AI 32768 $3.97 75.1
Mixtral Groq Groq 16384 $3.37 73.1
Nova Lite Turbo Amazon 8192 $9.14 73.2
Command R+ Chat Cohere 32768 $4.02 76.0
GPT-4.1 Mini OpenAI 128000 $10.43 74.3

Other benchmarks for Nova Lite Turbo

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 77.9 247 59th
GPQA Diamond 67.8 315 48th
SWE-bench Verified 63.8 237 61th
HumanEval 76.8 312 48th
MATH-500 77.6 264 56th
AIME 2025 68.0 296 51th
LiveCodeBench 65.7 282 53th
IFEval 79.3 344 43th
TruthfulQA 76.1 304 49th
MMMU 67.6 352 41th
Arena Elo 1383.7 266 56th

FAQ

What score does Nova Lite Turbo get on HellaSwag?

Nova Lite Turbo scores 85.0 on HellaSwag in this index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the top score is 96.1.

How does Nova Lite Turbo rank on HellaSwag?

It ranks #248 of 600 models, in the 59th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Is Nova Lite Turbo good at HellaSwag?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HellaSwag score calculated?

HellaSwag is a commonsense benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Nova Lite Turbo cost?

Nova Lite Turbo costs $9.14 per million input tokens and $42.63 per million output tokens.

Related