Instruction following · Amazon

Nova Lite Turbo on IFEval: score, rank and what it means

Nova Lite Turbo scores 79.3 on IFEval, placing it #344 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 78.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 96.1.

Score
79.3
0–100 scale
Rank
#344
of 600
Percentile
43th
within the index
Benchmark avg
78.6
all models
Leader
96.1
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
16.8
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on IFEval, with Nova Lite Turbo highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 96.1
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.6
GPT-5.2 Max 95.2
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 95.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 94.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 94.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.5
o4 Reasoning 94.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
5 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
6 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
7 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
8 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5

What this score means

On IFEval, Nova Lite Turbo sits at #344 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 16.8 points. The median model in this index scores 81.2, which puts Nova Lite Turbo below the midpoint.

Amazon models average 81.5 on this benchmark. Nova Lite Turbo is 2.2 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Amazon model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 76.5. Nova Lite Turbo is 2.8 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 79.3 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $9.14 per million input tokens, Nova Lite Turbo is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on IFEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 3 Modal Base Modal 16384 $3.21 72.2
Doubao 1.5 Pro Mini ByteDance 32768 $8.30 72.3
Llama 3.1 Turbo Base Together AI 16384 $3.30 73.0
Mixtral Turbo Base Together AI 32768 $2.53 69.7
Nova Lite Turbo Amazon 8192 $9.14 73.2
Nova Pro Mini Amazon 16384 $7.74 70.6
Qwen3-Max Nano Alibaba Cloud 65536 $8.31 71.7

Other benchmarks for Nova Lite Turbo

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 77.9 247 59th
GPQA Diamond 67.8 315 48th
SWE-bench Verified 63.8 237 61th
HumanEval 76.8 312 48th
MATH-500 77.6 264 56th
AIME 2025 68.0 296 51th
LiveCodeBench 65.7 282 53th
TruthfulQA 76.1 304 49th
HellaSwag 85.0 248 59th
MMMU 67.6 352 41th
Arena Elo 1383.7 266 56th

FAQ

What score does Nova Lite Turbo get on IFEval?

Nova Lite Turbo scores 79.3 on IFEval in this index. The benchmark average is 78.6 and the top score is 96.1.

How does Nova Lite Turbo rank on IFEval?

It ranks #344 of 600 models, in the 43rd percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 96.1.

Is Nova Lite Turbo good at IFEval?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the IFEval score calculated?

IFEval is a instruction following benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Nova Lite Turbo cost?

Nova Lite Turbo costs $9.14 per million input tokens and $42.63 per million output tokens.

Related