Nova Pro Turbo on IFEval: score, rank and what it means
Nova Pro Turbo scores 88.1 on IFEval, placing it #100 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 78.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 96.1.
Score distribution
The chart shows the top 10 models on IFEval, with Nova Pro Turbo highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.
Top 10 leaderboard
| # | Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 4.5 Pro | Anthropic | 200000 | $20.98 | 89.1 |
| 2 | Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning | Anthropic | 2000000 | $20.91 | 88.2 |
| 3 | GPT-5.2 Pro | OpenAI | 2000000 | $21.32 | 89.6 |
| 4 | GPT-5.2 Max | OpenAI | 1000000 | $21.39 | 89.2 |
| 5 | GPT-5.2 Reasoning | OpenAI | 1000000 | $20.98 | 87.5 |
| 6 | GPT-5.1 Pro | OpenAI | 200000 | $19.77 | 87.8 |
| 7 | Gemini 3 Pro Max | Google DeepMind | 2000000 | $20.57 | 87.9 |
| 8 | GPT-5.1 Reasoning | OpenAI | 400000 | $20.27 | 88.3 |
| 9 | Claude Opus 4.5 Max | Anthropic | 1000000 | $20.90 | 87.8 |
| 10 | o4 Reasoning | OpenAI | 1000000 | $19.69 | 87.5 |
What this score means
On IFEval, Nova Pro Turbo sits at #100 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 8.0 points. The median model in this index scores 81.2, which puts Nova Pro Turbo above the midpoint.
Amazon models average 81.5 on this benchmark. Nova Pro Turbo is 6.6 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Amazon model.
Among multimodal models, the average is 85.2. Nova Pro Turbo is 2.9 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.
Read a 88.1 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.
Price context
At $13.18 per million input tokens, Nova Pro Turbo is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on IFEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.
| Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sonar Pro Max | Perplexity | 128000 | $14.01 | 81.1 |
| DeepSeek-R1 Base | DeepSeek | 400000 | $5.05 | 80.1 |
| GPT-4.1 Turbo | OpenAI | 1000000 | $16.12 | 82.9 |
| Kimi K1.5 Chat | Moonshot AI | 128000 | $5.11 | 80.2 |
| Nova Pro Turbo | Amazon | 128000 | $13.18 | 78.4 |
| Kimi K2 Chat | Moonshot AI | 400000 | $5.74 | 82.1 |
| MiniMax-M2 Chat | MiniMax | 200000 | $5.02 | 80.2 |
Other benchmarks for Nova Pro Turbo
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Percentile | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 81.8 | 128 | 79th | |
| GPQA Diamond | 72.4 | 212 | 65th | |
| SWE-bench Verified | 66.2 | 190 | 68th | |
| HumanEval | 82.5 | 176 | 71th | |
| MATH-500 | 81.1 | 190 | 68th | |
| AIME 2025 | 75.5 | 148 | 75th | |
| LiveCodeBench | 70.9 | 173 | 71th | |
| TruthfulQA | 83.5 | 94 | 84th | |
| HellaSwag | 86.1 | 215 | 64th | |
| MMMU | 74.4 | 175 | 71th | |
| Arena Elo | 1433.2 | 113 | 81th |
FAQ
What score does Nova Pro Turbo get on IFEval?
Nova Pro Turbo scores 88.1 on IFEval in this index. The benchmark average is 78.6 and the top score is 96.1.
How does Nova Pro Turbo rank on IFEval?
It ranks #100 of 600 models, in the 83rd percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 96.1.
Is Nova Pro Turbo good at IFEval?
Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.
How is the IFEval score calculated?
IFEval is a instruction following benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.
What does Nova Pro Turbo cost?
Nova Pro Turbo costs $13.18 per million input tokens and $51.70 per million output tokens.