Mathematics · OpenAI

o4 Nano on AIME 2025: score, rank and what it means

o4 Nano scores 64.2 on AIME 2025, placing it #354 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Score
64.2
0–100 scale
Rank
#354
of 600
Percentile
41th
within the index
Benchmark avg
63.6
all models
Leader
91.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
27.2
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on AIME 2025, with o4 Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.4
GPT-5.2 Pro 91.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 90.6
GPT-5.2 90.6
o4 Reasoning 90.3
o4 Pro 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 89.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 88.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
5 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
6 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
8 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On AIME 2025, o4 Nano sits at #354 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 91.4, so the gap to the top is 27.2 points. The median model in this index scores 67.6, which puts o4 Nano below the midpoint.

OpenAI models average 80.9 on this benchmark. o4 Nano is 16.7 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average OpenAI model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 60.1. o4 Nano is 4.1 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 64.2 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $8.61 per million input tokens, o4 Nano is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on AIME 2025. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Mixtral Chat Mistral AI 65536 $3.30 72.6
Nova Pro Mini Amazon 16384 $7.74 70.6
Gemma 3 Base Google DeepMind 65536 $3.09 71.1
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Nano Anthropic 8192 $8.93 72.0
o4 Nano OpenAI 65536 $8.61 72.0
Fusion Turbo OpenRouter 8192 $8.55 71.7
Sonar Pro Mini Perplexity 8192 $8.02 70.3

Other benchmarks for o4 Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 74.9 339 44th
GPQA Diamond 67.3 327 46th
SWE-bench Verified 62.3 272 55th
HumanEval 74.7 350 42th
MATH-500 74.0 349 42th
LiveCodeBench 65.9 278 54th
IFEval 81.6 286 52th
TruthfulQA 75.2 327 46th
HellaSwag 81.2 363 40th
MMMU 70.2 296 51th
Arena Elo 1374.8 294 51th

FAQ

What score does o4 Nano get on AIME 2025?

o4 Nano scores 64.2 on AIME 2025 in this index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the top score is 91.4.

How does o4 Nano rank on AIME 2025?

It ranks #354 of 600 models, in the 41st percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Is o4 Nano good at AIME 2025?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the AIME 2025 score calculated?

AIME 2025 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does o4 Nano cost?

o4 Nano costs $8.61 per million input tokens and $41.97 per million output tokens.

Related