Reasoning · Microsoft

Phi-3.5 7B on GPQA Diamond: score, rank and what it means

Phi-3.5 7B scores 47.6 on GPQA Diamond, placing it #542 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Score
47.6
0–100 scale
Rank
#542
of 600
Percentile
10th
within the index
Benchmark avg
65.6
all models
Leader
87.0
GPT-5.2 Reasoning
Gap to leader
39.4
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on GPQA Diamond, with Phi-3.5 7B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Reasoning 87.0
GPT-5.1 Max 86.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 86.0
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 85.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.2 84.9
o4 Turbo 84.8
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 84.6
Grok 4 Turbo 84.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
7 o4 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.34 86.6
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
10 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2

What this score means

On GPQA Diamond, Phi-3.5 7B sits at #542 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Reasoning, scores 87.0, so the gap to the top is 39.4 points. The median model in this index scores 68.8, which puts Phi-3.5 7B below the midpoint.

Microsoft models average 58.6 on this benchmark. Phi-3.5 7B is 11.0 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Microsoft model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 49.3. Phi-3.5 7B is 1.7 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 47.6 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $0.50 per million input tokens, Phi-3.5 7B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on GPQA Diamond. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Yi-Lightning 1.5B 01.AI 4096 $0.54 50.0
Arctic 8B Snowflake 8192 $0.65 52.4
Molmo 8B Allen Institute for AI 32768 $0.44 49.9
Mixtral Turbo 7B Together AI 8192 $0.68 53.2
Phi-3.5 7B Microsoft 4096 $0.50 50.5
GLM-4.5 1.5B Zhipu AI 16384 $0.65 53.3
Mixtral Groq 7B Groq 4096 $0.70 53.4

Other benchmarks for Phi-3.5 7B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 59.3 534 11th
SWE-bench Verified 33.2 570 5th
HumanEval 54.5 547 9th
MATH-500 51.8 544 9th
AIME 2025 36.8 557 7th
LiveCodeBench 35.2 569 5th
IFEval 61.5 561 7th
TruthfulQA 55.0 574 4th
HellaSwag 69.1 546 9th
MMMU 51.1 543 10th
Arena Elo 1190.4 565 6th

FAQ

What score does Phi-3.5 7B get on GPQA Diamond?

Phi-3.5 7B scores 47.6 on GPQA Diamond in this index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the top score is 87.0.

How does Phi-3.5 7B rank on GPQA Diamond?

It ranks #542 of 600 models, in the 10th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Is Phi-3.5 7B good at GPQA Diamond?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the GPQA Diamond score calculated?

GPQA Diamond is a reasoning benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Phi-3.5 7B cost?

Phi-3.5 7B costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $2.68 per million output tokens.

Related