Reasoning · Microsoft

Phi-3.5 Base on GPQA Diamond: score, rank and what it means

Phi-3.5 Base scores 60.3 on GPQA Diamond, placing it #402 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Score
60.3
0–100 scale
Rank
#402
of 600
Percentile
33th
within the index
Benchmark avg
65.6
all models
Leader
87.0
GPT-5.2 Reasoning
Gap to leader
26.7
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on GPQA Diamond, with Phi-3.5 Base highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Reasoning 87.0
GPT-5.1 Max 86.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 86.0
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 85.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.2 84.9
o4 Turbo 84.8
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 84.6
Grok 4 Turbo 84.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
7 o4 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.34 86.6
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
10 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2

What this score means

On GPQA Diamond, Phi-3.5 Base sits at #402 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Reasoning, scores 87.0, so the gap to the top is 26.7 points. The median model in this index scores 68.8, which puts Phi-3.5 Base below the midpoint.

Microsoft models average 58.6 on this benchmark. Phi-3.5 Base is 1.7 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Microsoft model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 63.6. Phi-3.5 Base is 3.3 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 60.3 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $2.24 per million input tokens, Phi-3.5 Base is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on GPQA Diamond. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
SmolLM3 Hugging Face 8192 $1.71 63.1
Nova Pro Nano Amazon 8192 $5.44 65.4
Zephyr Hugging Face 8192 $1.61 62.8
Sonar Mini Perplexity 65536 $6.52 67.9
Phi-3.5 Base Microsoft 65536 $2.24 66.6
DeepSeek-V3.2 7B DeepSeek 4096 $1.75 63.2
Reka Flash Mini Reka AI 16384 $5.77 65.5

Other benchmarks for Phi-3.5 Base

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 72.4 379 37th
SWE-bench Verified 51.6 409 32th
HumanEval 73.1 371 38th
MATH-500 71.6 373 38th
AIME 2025 59.7 389 35th
LiveCodeBench 55.2 401 33th
IFEval 74.2 404 33th
TruthfulQA 73.0 370 38th
HellaSwag 79.5 389 35th
MMMU 61.7 412 31th
Arena Elo 1315.0 400 33th

FAQ

What score does Phi-3.5 Base get on GPQA Diamond?

Phi-3.5 Base scores 60.3 on GPQA Diamond in this index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the top score is 87.0.

How does Phi-3.5 Base rank on GPQA Diamond?

It ranks #402 of 600 models, in the 33rd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Is Phi-3.5 Base good at GPQA Diamond?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the GPQA Diamond score calculated?

GPQA Diamond is a reasoning benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Phi-3.5 Base cost?

Phi-3.5 Base costs $2.24 per million input tokens and $10.25 per million output tokens.

Related