Knowledge · Microsoft

Phi-3.5 on MMLU-Pro: score, rank and what it means

Phi-3.5 scores 76.1 on MMLU-Pro, placing it #304 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Score
76.1
0–100 scale
Rank
#304
of 600
Percentile
49th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.5
all models
Leader
91.6
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
15.5
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMLU-Pro, with Phi-3.5 highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 91.6
GPT-5.1 Max 91.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.2
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 90.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.1
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.5
GPT-5.2 Vision 89.5
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
5 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
6 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
7 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On MMLU-Pro, Phi-3.5 sits at #304 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 91.6, so the gap to the top is 15.5 points. The median model in this index scores 76.1, which puts Phi-3.5 above the midpoint.

Microsoft models average 68.2 on this benchmark. Phi-3.5 is 7.9 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Microsoft model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 72.1. Phi-3.5 is 4.0 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 76.1 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $2.81 per million input tokens, Phi-3.5 is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMLU-Pro. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Claude Opus 4.5 Nano Anthropic 32768 $9.38 73.3
Command R+ Base Cohere 65536 $3.24 71.6
GLM-4.5 Base Zhipu AI 32768 $3.99 74.9
Mixtral Chat Mistral AI 65536 $3.30 72.6
Phi-3.5 Microsoft 16384 $2.81 70.9
Auto Turbo OpenRouter 65536 $7.96 70.9
Firefunction Fireworks AI 16384 $8.16 72.3

Other benchmarks for Phi-3.5

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
GPQA Diamond 67.0 331 45th
SWE-bench Verified 60.9 308 49th
HumanEval 76.2 327 46th
MATH-500 75.4 316 47th
AIME 2025 60.6 383 36th
LiveCodeBench 59.8 371 38th
IFEval 77.1 377 37th
TruthfulQA 74.8 336 44th
HellaSwag 82.9 323 46th
MMMU 68.8 328 45th
Arena Elo 1356.7 350 42th

FAQ

What score does Phi-3.5 get on MMLU-Pro?

Phi-3.5 scores 76.1 on MMLU-Pro in this index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the top score is 91.6.

How does Phi-3.5 rank on MMLU-Pro?

It ranks #304 of 600 models, in the 49th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Is Phi-3.5 good at MMLU-Pro?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMLU-Pro score calculated?

MMLU-Pro is a knowledge benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Phi-3.5 cost?

Phi-3.5 costs $2.81 per million input tokens and $14.99 per million output tokens.

Related