Commonsense · Microsoft

Phi-4 on HellaSwag: score, rank and what it means

Phi-4 scores 86.3 on HellaSwag, placing it #206 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Score
86.3
0–100 scale
Rank
#206
of 600
Percentile
66th
within the index
Benchmark avg
81.4
all models
Leader
96.1
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
9.8
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HellaSwag, with Phi-4 highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.1
GPT-5.2 Turbo 95.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 95.2
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 95.2
Grok 4 Reasoning 95.2
GPT-5.2 Vision 94.6
Gemini 3 Pro Turbo 94.6
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.4
o4 Pro 94.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
8 Gemini 3 Pro Turbo Google DeepMind 400000 $19.62 86.4
9 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
10 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3

What this score means

On HellaSwag, Phi-4 sits at #206 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 9.8 points. The median model in this index scores 83.6, which puts Phi-4 above the midpoint.

Microsoft models average 76.8 on this benchmark. Phi-4 is 9.5 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Microsoft model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 86.8. Phi-4 is 0.5 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 86.3 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $3.96 per million input tokens, Phi-4 is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HellaSwag. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Reka Core Max Reka AI 128000 $13.41 79.3
o3 Mini OpenAI 128000 $10.68 76.2
Codestral Chat Mistral AI 32768 $3.89 75.8
Llama 3 Replicate Instruct Replicate 128000 $3.71 75.1
Phi-4 Microsoft 200000 $3.96 75.4
Reka Core Turbo Reka AI 32768 $12.58 78.4
Llama 3 Lambda Chat Lambda 32768 $3.73 74.7

Other benchmarks for Phi-4

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 79.5 198 67th
GPQA Diamond 69.4 284 53th
SWE-bench Verified 66.5 180 70th
HumanEval 79.4 253 58th
MATH-500 79.0 236 61th
AIME 2025 74.1 180 70th
LiveCodeBench 64.7 303 50th
IFEval 83.0 246 59th
TruthfulQA 76.5 295 51th
MMMU 71.2 267 56th
Arena Elo 1392.0 240 60th

FAQ

What score does Phi-4 get on HellaSwag?

Phi-4 scores 86.3 on HellaSwag in this index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the top score is 96.1.

How does Phi-4 rank on HellaSwag?

It ranks #206 of 600 models, in the 66th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Is Phi-4 good at HellaSwag?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HellaSwag score calculated?

HellaSwag is a commonsense benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Phi-4 cost?

Phi-4 costs $3.96 per million input tokens and $20.63 per million output tokens.

Related