Multimodal · Microsoft

Phi-4 on MMMU: score, rank and what it means

Phi-4 scores 71.2 on MMMU, placing it #267 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Score
71.2
0–100 scale
Rank
#267
of 600
Percentile
56th
within the index
Benchmark avg
67.1
all models
Leader
86.9
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
15.7
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMMU, with Phi-4 highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 86.9
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 86.2
GPT-5.2 85.3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.1 Max 85.1
Grok 4 Pro 84.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro 84.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.4
GPT-5.2 Vision 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
5 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
6 Grok 4 Pro xAI 1000000 $19.00 85.4
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $18.73 86.7
9 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
10 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4

What this score means

On MMMU, Phi-4 sits at #267 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 86.9, so the gap to the top is 15.7 points. The median model in this index scores 70.0, which puts Phi-4 above the midpoint.

Microsoft models average 59.7 on this benchmark. Phi-4 is 11.5 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Microsoft model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 74.3. Phi-4 is 3.1 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 71.2 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $3.96 per million input tokens, Phi-4 is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMMU. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Gemini 2.5 Pro Mini Google DeepMind 128000 $10.07 74.2
Llama 3.1 Cerebras Instruct Cerebras 65536 $4.11 76.1
Llama 3.1 Turbo Instruct Together AI 32768 $4.21 76.7
Llama 3 Lambda Base Lambda 8192 $3.19 72.9
Phi-4 Microsoft 200000 $3.96 75.4
Sonar Turbo Perplexity 65536 $10.71 75.7
Yi-Large Chat 01.AI 65536 $3.49 73.5

Other benchmarks for Phi-4

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 79.5 198 67th
GPQA Diamond 69.4 284 53th
SWE-bench Verified 66.5 180 70th
HumanEval 79.4 253 58th
MATH-500 79.0 236 61th
AIME 2025 74.1 180 70th
LiveCodeBench 64.7 303 50th
IFEval 83.0 246 59th
TruthfulQA 76.5 295 51th
HellaSwag 86.3 206 66th
Arena Elo 1392.0 240 60th

FAQ

What score does Phi-4 get on MMMU?

Phi-4 scores 71.2 on MMMU in this index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the top score is 86.9.

How does Phi-4 rank on MMMU?

It ranks #267 of 600 models, in the 56th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Is Phi-4 good at MMMU?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMMU score calculated?

MMMU is a multimodal benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Phi-4 cost?

Phi-4 costs $3.96 per million input tokens and $20.63 per million output tokens.

Related