Mathematics · EleutherAI

Pythia on AIME 2025: score, rank and what it means

Pythia scores 50.0 on AIME 2025, placing it #460 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Score
50.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#460
of 600
Percentile
23th
within the index
Benchmark avg
63.6
all models
Leader
91.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
41.4
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on AIME 2025, with Pythia highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.4
GPT-5.2 Pro 91.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 90.6
GPT-5.2 90.6
o4 Reasoning 90.3
o4 Pro 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 89.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 88.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
5 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
6 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
8 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On AIME 2025, Pythia sits at #460 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 91.4, so the gap to the top is 41.4 points. The median model in this index scores 67.6, which puts Pythia below the midpoint.

EleutherAI models average 39.0 on this benchmark. Pythia is 11.0 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average EleutherAI model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 61.8. Pythia is 11.8 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 50.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $1.29 per million input tokens, Pythia is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on AIME 2025. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Sonar Nano Perplexity 4096 $4.37 61.9
MiniMax-Text 8B MiniMax 4096 $1.22 59.5
Llama 4 Scout 8B Meta AI 8192 $1.46 61.2
Llama 3.1 8B Meta AI 8192 $1.15 58.7
Pythia EleutherAI 32768 $1.29 59.8
Codestral 8B Mistral AI 4096 $1.18 59.0
Auto Mini OpenRouter 4096 $4.24 61.6

Other benchmarks for Pythia

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 63.1 487 19th
GPQA Diamond 55.6 455 24th
SWE-bench Verified 44.8 467 22th
HumanEval 62.8 460 23th
MATH-500 63.6 428 29th
LiveCodeBench 52.2 427 29th
IFEval 70.4 454 24th
TruthfulQA 67.2 426 29th
HellaSwag 72.8 485 19th
MMMU 55.0 497 17th
Arena Elo 1259.9 476 21th

FAQ

What score does Pythia get on AIME 2025?

Pythia scores 50.0 on AIME 2025 in this index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the top score is 91.4.

How does Pythia rank on AIME 2025?

It ranks #460 of 600 models, in the 23rd percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Is Pythia good at AIME 2025?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the AIME 2025 score calculated?

AIME 2025 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Pythia cost?

Pythia costs $1.29 per million input tokens and $5.47 per million output tokens.

Related